Redemption Fee can’t be imposed for ADD Escaped Assessment: CESTAT [Read Order]

Redemption Fee - ADD Escaped Assessment - CESTAT - Taxscan

The Chennai bench of the CESTAT has held that redemption fee cannot be imposed for the escaped assessment of Anti-Dumping Duty.

M/s. LSML Private Ltd are manufacturers of wind turbines, imported 1262 pieces of Hot Rolled Painted Steel Plates weighing 5507.403 MT, through the Chennai Port, vide BE no. 4008987 dated 22.01.2016 and bonded the goods in public bonded warehouse; they made various clearances either for themselves or third parties such as Rajam Steels ad V.K. Industrial Corporation Ltd etc and were duly allowed to be cleared by the bond officer; in respect of 878.395 MT, vide BE No. 3056014 dated 31.08.2017, officers of SIIB stopped the clearance, after payment of the duties as per the assessment made through the EDI. The department found that the goods are liable for the payment of the anti-dumping duty. The department also imposed redemption fee on the appellants for the violation of the statute.

The bench comprising Mr. Ramesh Nair (JM) and Mr. P Anjani Kumar (TM) observed that in view of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Antidumping Duty is to be construed as Customs duty and therefore in view of the amendment that was carried out in 2009 all the provisions of Customs Act and the Rules made thereunder are squarely applicable to Antidumping Duty and as such in case of warehoused goods duty applicable as on the date of clearance from warehouse is to be recovered in terms of Section 15 of the Customs Act, 1962.

“Therefore, we find that Ld. Commissioner has correctly held that ADD is payable by the appellants,” the bench said.

With regard to the levy of redemption fine, the Tribunal held that “confiscation and imposition of redemption fine are not warranted as here was nothing that the appellant-importers have consciously suppressed or misrepresented. If ADD escaped assessment, the department is free to demand the same as per provisions of Customs Act, 1962. However, for the same reason, goods cannot be confiscated and penalty cannot be imposed. Therefore, we set aside the confiscation of the goods, imposition of redemption fine and various penalties. For this reason, we find that department appeal has no merit and needs to be rejected except on levy of interest under Section 28AA on ADD of Rs.79,55,066/- in respect of goods cleared vide BE No.3056014 dt. 31.08.2017 which we have already upheld.”

Advocate N. Viswanathan appeared for the appellants.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

taxscan-loader