No Close Shave! Madras HC Favours Gillette’s Subsidiary, Holds GST Refund Claims Were Within Limitation [Read Order]

The Madras High Court did not endorse the restrictive interpretation adopted by the Revenue to ascertain the limitation period.
Close Shave - Madras HC Favours Gillettes Subsidiary - GST Refund Claims - Limitation - TAXSCAN

The Madras High Court has ruled in favour of M/s Gillette Diversified Operations Private Limited (Gillette), holding that its Goods and Services Tax (GST) refund claims were filed within the prescribed limitation period, rejecting the Revenue Department’s contention that they were time-barred. The case arose when Gillette Diversified, a subsidiary of the global consumer goods…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Already a member? Log in here
taxscan-loader