Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Madras High Court nullified a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) DRC-07 order issued disregarding the assessee's submitted reply. The challenge to an order dated 29.12.2023 arised from the petitioner's contention that their
Supreme Court and High Courts Weekly Round up
This weekly round-up analytically summarizes the key stories related to the Supreme Court and High Court reported at Taxscan.in from May 04th, 2024 to May 10th, 2024. SUPREME COURT Amounts covered by Security deposits under
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) portal. A  Single bench of Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoothy
Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the refund of the recovered amount as the proper officer failed to explain the reason for recovering the amount under Section 78 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax, 2017
Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently overturned a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) order, requiring a pre-deposit of 10%. The order had confirmed the tax liability based on alleged wrongful availment of Input Tax
CBDT’s Office Memo (Instr No.1914) does not Mandate 20% Remittance of Disputed Tax for Stay Application: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that the Office Memorandum (Instruction No.1914) of the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) does not mandate 20% remittance of the disputed tax for
GST Officers Confirms Demand Claiming ITC wrongly availed on Commercial Vehicle Purchases: Madras HC orders Reconsideration
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court set aside the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order which confirmed the demand claiming the Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) wrongly availed on
Unawareness of Proceedings w.r.t GST Returns Disparity due to Order Uploaded in Additional Notices and Orders tab: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit Remand
The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of 10% for contesting the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which confirmed failure to respond to the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) proceedings
GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court held that the documents such as GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and Income Tax records alone are insufficient to establish that Goods Transport Services fall under the Reverse Charge Mechanism ( RCM
Madras HC quashes GST Assessment Orders issued without considering Interim Reply Submitted by Taxpayer [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment orders issued without considering the interim reply submitted by the petitioner/taxpayer. The court directed the GST officers to take up the
Madras HC Mandates 10% Pre-deposit to Contest GSTR 1 vs GSTR 3B Discrepancy [Read Order]
The Madras High Court mandated a pre-deposit of 10% to contest the discrepancy of Goods and Services Tax Returns ( GSTR 1 ) and GSTR 3B. The challenge to an assessment order dated 19.10.2023 has
Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]
The Madras High Court orders pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed demand to nullify the contested order. The court's decision came in light of the assessee's non-participation in the Goods and Services Tax ( GST
Faceless Personal Hearing is mandatory u/s 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act if Requested: Madras HC Interprets term ‘Shall’
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the faceless personal hearing is mandatory under Section 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act, 1961 if requested. The court interpreted the ‘Shall’ in the section
Madras HC Overturns Rejection of GST Refund Application due to Inverted Turnover and GSTR1, 3B and 2A Discrepancy [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court overturned the rejection of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) refund application due to the Discrepancies between Inverted Turnover and GSTR 1, 3B and 2A The
Failure to file ITR on Grounds of Illness and Demise of CA: Madras HC Condones Delay of 927 Days [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court condoned the delay of 927 days. The court considered the failure to file the Income Tax Returns ( ITR ) on grounds of illness and subsequent  demise