Short Payment of Taxes due to Excess ITC Claim, No Hearing Provided: Madras HC Grants Hearing on Pre-Deposit [Read Order]

Relying on a precedent set in M/s. K. Balakrishnan, Balu Cables v. Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, the petitioner was granted fresh consideration of matter, committing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax
Madras HC - Madras High court - Short Payment of Taxes - Excess ITC Claim - ITC Claim - Goods and Services Tax - taxscan

In a recent ruling, the Madras High court has granted the personal hearing with pre-deposit against the order issued for short payment of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) due to excess input tax credit ( ITC ) claim. The court noted that the petitioner was provided no hearing. 

The petitioner, M/s Summit Exim, in its petition submitted that while an intimation in ASMT-10 was issued on May 2, 2023, and a notice in DRC-01 followed on August 28, 2023, along with an opportunity for a personal hearing on September 7, 2023, these communications were uploaded only on the GST portal.

It was submitted that they were unaware of the proceedings due to a lack of direct service via Registered Post with Acknowledgment Due (RPAD) or tender, resulting in their inability to respond or participate in the adjudication process.

Complete Supreme Court Judgment on GST from 2017 to 2024 with Free E-Book Access, Click here

Relying on a precedent set in M/s. K. Balakrishnan, Balu Cables v. Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, the petitioner requested the matter be remanded for fresh consideration, committing to deposit 25% of the disputed tax. The department’s counsel raised no objection to this request.

Justice Mohammed Shaffiq set aside the impugned order and directed the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks.

Complete Supreme Court Judgment on GST from 2017 to 2024 with Free E-Book Access, Click here

The order of assessment was directed to be treated as a show cause notice, and the petitioner must submit objections with supporting evidence within the same timeframe. The adjudicating authority was instructed to consider the objections and pass a reasoned order after granting the petitioner a fair hearing.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader