- Home
- »
- Yogitha S Yogesh

Yogitha S Yogesh
![Delay in Loan Restructuring Proceedings: DRAT directs DRT to decide OA Expeditiously [Read Order] Delay in Loan Restructuring Proceedings: DRAT directs DRT to decide OA Expeditiously [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/500x300_2093431-dr.webp)
Delay in Loan Restructuring Proceedings: DRAT directs DRT to decide OA Expeditiously [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) has dismissed an appeal filed against Bank of Baroda & ors on finding delay in ...
DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Kolkata, disposed of two appeals filed by Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. (HUDCO) by upholding the finality of recovery...
NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an appeal filed by Siddharth Satish Katariya, Ex-Director of Superfine Extrusions Private Limited (SEPL),...
NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order]
While allowing appeal filed by Canara Bank, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the Adjudicating Authority, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)...
Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that a commercial litigant cannot evade the consequences of repeated non-appearance and negligence in prosecuting...
Delhi HC upholds ITAT order Invalidating Penalty Imposed u/s 271 citing Absence of Valid Notice [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) order invalidating the penalty imposed under Section 271 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, citing the absence of...


![Kerala HC Stays Income Tax Recovery Proceedings Pending Disposal of Stay Petition, Directs Commissioner to Decide Within 2 Months [Read Order] Kerala HC Stays Income Tax Recovery Proceedings Pending Disposal of Stay Petition, Directs Commissioner to Decide Within 2 Months [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093551-kerala-hc-income-tax-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp)
![Relief to Central Bank of India: DRAT upholds forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules [Read Order] Relief to Central Bank of India: DRAT upholds forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093464-central-bank-of-india-drat-forfeiture-sarfaesi-rules-taxscan.webp)
![DRAT dismisses Waiver Application due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order, Rejects Appeal against UBI [Read Order] DRAT dismisses Waiver Application due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order, Rejects Appeal against UBI [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093435-union-bank-india-taxscan.webp)
![Pre-deposit Conditions are Mandatory: DRAT dismisses Appeal against SBI for Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit [Read Order] Pre-deposit Conditions are Mandatory: DRAT dismisses Appeal against SBI for Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093441-pre-deposit-drat-non-compliance-of-pre-deposit-sbi-taxscan.webp)
![DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order] DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093072-drat-taxscan.webp)
![DRAT dismisses IDFC First Banks Appeal in Default Due to Non-Representation [Read Order] DRAT dismisses IDFC First Banks Appeal in Default Due to Non-Representation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093011-drat-idfc-first-bank-idfc-first-banks-appeal-non-representation-taxscan.webp)
![NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order] NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2092979-appeal-dismissed-taxscan.webp)
![Alleged Bias by Technical Member Not Proven: NCLAT declines to recall Dismissal Order [Read Order] Alleged Bias by Technical Member Not Proven: NCLAT declines to recall Dismissal Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092753-2062469-nclat-fraud-finding-former-director-orders-contribution-sham-transactions-taxscan.webp)
![NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order] NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092768-nclt-adjudicating-on-limitation-appointment-of-resolution-taxscan.webp)
![Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order] Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092752-nclat-commercial-litigant-counsel-taxscan.webp)
![Delhi HC upholds ITAT order Invalidating Penalty Imposed u/s 271 citing Absence of Valid Notice [Read Order] Delhi HC upholds ITAT order Invalidating Penalty Imposed u/s 271 citing Absence of Valid Notice [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092741-delhi-hc-upholds-itat-order-penalty-taxscan.webp)