![Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114195-failure-meet-nclt-timelines-justifies-full-forfeiture-deposits-supreme-court-rejects-purchases-challenge-liquidation-sale-taxscan.webp "Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]")
Failure to Meet NCLT Timelines Justifies Full Forfeiture of Deposits: Supreme Court Rejects Purchaser’s Challenge in Liquidation Sale [Read Order]
The Supreme Court in a recent case has upheld the full forfeiture of ₹37.80 crore deposited by the appellant towards the proposed purchase of the...
![Liquidator Cannot Short-Circuit Jurisdiction: NCLAT Refuses to Adjudicate Disputed Contractual Dues Against UP Rajkiya Nirman Nigam [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/250x150_2111253-liquidator-cannot-short-circuit-jurisdictn-nclat-refuses-adjudicate-disputed-contractual-dues-against-up-rajkiya-nirman-nigam-taxscan.webp "Liquidator Cannot Short-Circuit Jurisdiction: NCLAT Refuses to Adjudicate Disputed Contractual Dues Against UP Rajkiya Nirman Nigam [Read Order]")
![Non‑Cooperation with RP and Related‑Party Diversions Prove Intent to Defraud Creditors: NCLAT Upholds S.66 Directions Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/250x150_2112868-non-cooperation-rp-related-party-diversions-prove-intent-defraud-creditors-taxscan.webp "Non‑Cooperation with RP and Related‑Party Diversions Prove Intent to Defraud Creditors: NCLAT Upholds S.66 Directions Against Directors [Read Order]")
NCLT to Reconsider Rs. 92 Lakh Penalty Imposed for Non-Holding of AGMs Due to Directorial Deadlock: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, remanded the matter to NCLT Mumbai to reconsider the ₹92 lakh penalty imposed for non-holding of AGMs from 2016 to ...
Benami Attachment Cannot Breach the “Impregnable Firewall” of NCLT‑Approved Resolution Plan: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, in a recent ruling, has held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved Resolution Plan acts as an impregnable firewall against Benami attachment of an asset...
![Benami Attachment Cannot Breach the “Impregnable Firewall” of NCLT‑Approved Resolution Plan: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/23/500x300_2114211-benami-attachment-cannot-breach-impregnable-firewall-nclt-approved-resolution-plan-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Benami Attachment Cannot Breach the “Impregnable Firewall” of NCLT‑Approved Resolution Plan: Madras HC [Read Order]")
No Procedural Lapse by Resolution Professional: NCLAT Upholds Order Rejecting Repayment Plans of Guarantors [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at Chennai has upheld the rejection of repayment plans submitted by personal guarantors undergoing insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency...
![No Procedural Lapse by Resolution Professional: NCLAT Upholds Order Rejecting Repayment Plans of Guarantors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/10/500x300_2111276-nclat-chennai-resolution-professional-repayment-plans-guarantors-no-procedural-lapse-order-reject-taxscan.webp "No Procedural Lapse by Resolution Professional: NCLAT Upholds Order Rejecting Repayment Plans of Guarantors [Read Order]")
NCLT alone has Jurisdiction Over Personal Guarantor Insolvency when CIRP Is Pending: Bombay HC orders Transfer of Proceedings
The Bombay High Court held that insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors must be filed before, or transferred to, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) when the corporate debtor is ...
Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, ruled that suspended directors of a corporate debtor cannot demand access to valuation reports rejected by the...
![Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/13/500x300_2111901-suspended-directors-no-right-valuation-reports-rejected-coc-ibc-nclat-taxscan.webp "Suspended Directors Have No Right to Valuation Reports Rejected by COC u/s 24 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, in a recent case has held that the unexplained Rs 10.54 cr withdrawals demonstrated an intent to defraud creditors, attracting...
![Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/17/500x300_2112853-cash-withdrawals-show-intent-defraud-under-nclat-nclt-order-against-directors-taxscan.webp "Unexplained ₹10.54 Cr Cash Withdrawals Show Intent to Defraud Under S.66 IBC: NCLAT Upholds NCLT Order Against Directors [Read Order]")