Yogitha S Yogesh
![Winding-up Petition filed after Appointment of a liquidator: Delhi HC transfers Petition to NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/04/500x300_2072843-winding-up-petition-liquidator-delhi-hc-nclt-taxscan.webp "Winding-up Petition filed after Appointment of a liquidator: Delhi HC transfers Petition to NCLT [Read Order]")
Winding-up Petition filed after Appointment of a liquidator: Delhi HC transfers Petition to NCLT [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court transferred the Winding-up Petition filed after Appointment of a liquidator to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).Trigo...
![Incorporation of Investing Companies under Companies Act not sufficient to prove genuineness of Share Transactions: Calcutta HC sets aside ITAT’s Finding [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/04/250x150_2072862-calcutta-high-court-incorporation-of-investing-companies-investing-companies-taxscan.webp "Incorporation of Investing Companies under Companies Act not sufficient to prove genuineness of Share Transactions: Calcutta HC sets aside ITAT’s Finding [Read Order]")
![Lawyer Cannot Be Raided Merely for Representing Clients Tax Cases: Delhi HC Reprimands GST Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/04/250x150_2072842-lawyer-representing-clients-tax-cases-tax-cases-for-clients-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Lawyer Cannot Be Raided Merely for Representing Clients Tax Cases: Delhi HC Reprimands GST Dept [Read Order]")
![Relief to JSW Steel: Supreme Court upholds CESTAT Order Allowing Cenvat Credit [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/03/250x150_2072631-relief-jsw-steel-supreme-court-cestat-order-cenvat-credit-taxscan.webp "Relief to JSW Steel: Supreme Court upholds CESTAT Order Allowing Cenvat Credit [Read Judgement]")
![Supreme Court orders “Status quo on Pending NCLT Proceedings over JSW Steel Limited [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/03/250x150_2072623-supreme-court-status-quo-pending-nclt-proceedings-jsw-steel-limited-taxscan.webp "Supreme Court orders “Status quo on Pending NCLT Proceedings over JSW Steel Limited [Read Judgement]")
Protection of IBC is only applicable to corporate debtors and not to Person Who drawn cheque in Individual capacity: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad high court held that protection of Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 is only applicable to corporate debtors and not to persons who draw cheques in Individual capacity. The court...
![Protection of IBC is only applicable to corporate debtors and not to Person Who drawn cheque in Individual capacity: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2072117-individual-capacity-corporate-debtors-drawn-cheque-taxscan.webp "Protection of IBC is only applicable to corporate debtors and not to Person Who drawn cheque in Individual capacity: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Once Resolution Plan has approved by NCLT Commercial Tax Department cannot create further dues: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Allahabad High Court quashed the passed under section 28(2) (ii) of the U.P. VAT Act 2008 and under section 9(4) of the U.P. Tax on Entry of Goods Act 2007 demanding tax,...
![Once Resolution Plan has approved by NCLT Commercial Tax Department cannot create further dues: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2072105-allahabad-high-court-resolution-plan-nclt-taxscan.webp "Once Resolution Plan has approved by NCLT Commercial Tax Department cannot create further dues: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![Section 14 of IBC does not bar classification of account of CD during pendency of CIRP: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2071982-section-14-of-ibc-act-ibc-ibc-does-not-bar-classification-bar-classification-taxscan.webp "Section 14 of IBC does not bar classification of account of CD during pendency of CIRP: NCLT [Read Order]")
Permitting Repeated Invitation of EOI (Form G) merely on behest of Individual Stakeholder Will Defeat Timeliness under IBC: NCLT [Read Order]
The Chandhigarh bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) observed that permitting repeated invitations of Expression of Interest (Form G) merely on the behest of an individual stakeholder...
![Permitting Repeated Invitation of EOI (Form G) merely on behest of Individual Stakeholder Will Defeat Timeliness under IBC: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2071932-nclt-taxscan.webp "Permitting Repeated Invitation of EOI (Form G) merely on behest of Individual Stakeholder Will Defeat Timeliness under IBC: NCLT [Read Order]")
Non Cooperation of CocC Members and Suspended Management against Liquidator: NCLT Directs to Cooperate with Liquidator [Read Order]
In af recent case, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) on finding that the IRP has faced resistance from suspended management and the non-cooperation from the members of CoC, and directed the...
![Non Cooperation of CocC Members and Suspended Management against Liquidator: NCLT Directs to Cooperate with Liquidator [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2071945-liquidator-nclt-cooperate-taxscan.webp "Non Cooperation of CocC Members and Suspended Management against Liquidator: NCLT Directs to Cooperate with Liquidator [Read Order]")
Failure to Issue Fresh Form G for substantial assets or a new line of business Discovered: IBBI Suspends authorisation of RP
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India suspended the authorisation of Resolution Professional (RP) for three months on finding the failure to issue fresh Form G for the substantial assets or a...
Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)has held that proceedings initiated under section 7 of the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 is not...
![Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/01/500x300_2071830-proceedings-ibc-financial-creditor-received-pending-amount-nclat-taxscan.webp "Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC not valid when Financial Creditor already Received Pending Amount: NCLAT [Read Order]")