Yogitha S Yogesh
![DRAT Transfers ₹100 Cr Debt Recovery Case to DRT, Rejects Canara Banks Attempt to Split Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/500x300_2093456-drat-debt-recovery-drt-canara-bank-taxscan.webp "DRAT Transfers ₹100 Cr Debt Recovery Case to DRT, Rejects Canara Banks Attempt to Split Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
DRAT Transfers ₹100 Cr Debt Recovery Case to DRT, Rejects Canara Bank's Attempt to Split Jurisdiction [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), in a ruling rejecting the CanaraBank’s attempt to split jurisdiction, ordered the...
![Delay in Loan Restructuring Proceedings: DRAT directs DRT to decide OA Expeditiously [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093431-dr.webp "Delay in Loan Restructuring Proceedings: DRAT directs DRT to decide OA Expeditiously [Read Order]")
![Kerala HC Stays Income Tax Recovery Proceedings Pending Disposal of Stay Petition, Directs Commissioner to Decide Within 2 Months [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093551-kerala-hc-income-tax-recovery-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Kerala HC Stays Income Tax Recovery Proceedings Pending Disposal of Stay Petition, Directs Commissioner to Decide Within 2 Months [Read Order]")
![Relief to Central Bank of India: DRAT upholds forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093464-central-bank-of-india-drat-forfeiture-sarfaesi-rules-taxscan.webp "Relief to Central Bank of India: DRAT upholds forfeiture of earnest money under SARFAESI Rules [Read Order]")
![DRAT dismisses Waiver Application due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order, Rejects Appeal against UBI [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/250x150_2093435-union-bank-india-taxscan.webp "DRAT dismisses Waiver Application due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order, Rejects Appeal against UBI [Read Order]")
Pre-deposit Conditions are Mandatory: DRAT dismisses Appeal against SBI for Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chennai bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) has dismissed an appeal against State Bank of India for non-compliance with a conditional order requiring...
![Pre-deposit Conditions are Mandatory: DRAT dismisses Appeal against SBI for Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/03/500x300_2093441-pre-deposit-drat-non-compliance-of-pre-deposit-sbi-taxscan.webp "Pre-deposit Conditions are Mandatory: DRAT dismisses Appeal against SBI for Non-Compliance of Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Kolkata, disposed of two appeals filed by Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. (HUDCO) by upholding the finality of recovery...
![DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093072-drat-taxscan.webp "DRAT disposes of HUDCO appeals citing finality of Recovery Certificate, Directs Recovery Officer to proceed based on Crystallized Debt [Read Order]")
![DRAT dismisses IDFC First Banks Appeal in Default Due to Non-Representation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093011-drat-idfc-first-bank-idfc-first-banks-appeal-non-representation-taxscan.webp "DRAT dismisses IDFC First Banks Appeal in Default Due to Non-Representation [Read Order]")
NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an appeal filed by Siddharth Satish Katariya, Ex-Director of Superfine Extrusions Private Limited (SEPL),...
![NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2092979-appeal-dismissed-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Upholds CIRP Initiation by Central Bank Against Corporate Guarantor Despite Stamping and Novation Contentions, Dismisses Appeal of SEPL’s Ex Director [Read Order]")
![Alleged Bias by Technical Member Not Proven: NCLAT declines to recall Dismissal Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092753-2062469-nclat-fraud-finding-former-director-orders-contribution-sham-transactions-taxscan.webp "Alleged Bias by Technical Member Not Proven: NCLAT declines to recall Dismissal Order [Read Order]")
NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order]
While allowing appeal filed by Canara Bank, the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the Adjudicating Authority, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)...
![NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092768-nclt-adjudicating-on-limitation-appointment-of-resolution-taxscan.webp "NCLT Barred from Adjudicating on Limitation in S. 95 Applications before Appointment of Resolution Professional: NCLAT allows appeal filed by Canara Bank [Read Order]")
Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that a commercial litigant cannot evade the consequences of repeated non-appearance and negligence in prosecuting...
![Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/30/500x300_2092752-nclat-commercial-litigant-counsel-taxscan.webp "Commercial Litigant Cannot Shift Blame to Counsel for Repeated Non-Appearance in Restoration Applications: NCLAT [Read Order]")