- Home
- »
- Akhaigha T Josh

Akhaigha T Josh
![Penalty Invalid If Specific Charge u/s 270A is Not Mentioned in Income Tax SCN: ITAT Deletes Penalties for Four Assessment Years [Read Order] Penalty Invalid If Specific Charge u/s 270A is Not Mentioned in Income Tax SCN: ITAT Deletes Penalties for Four Assessment Years [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068451-penalty-income-tax-scn-itat-penalties-assessment-years-taxscan.webp)
Penalty Invalid If Specific Charge u/s 270A is Not Mentioned in Income Tax SCN: ITAT Deletes Penalties for Four Assessment Years [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted penalties levied on an assessee under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act,...
CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has dismissed the appeal filed by Mittal Corp Limited, upholding the confirmation of Central Excise duty...
Discretionary Trust created under Deceased’s Will Not Liable to Income Tax at Maximum Marginal Rate u/s 164: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Benchof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a discretionary trust which is created under the Will of a deceased individual is not liable to income tax at the maximum...
Assessee Fails to Prove Genuineness and Creditworthiness: ITAT upholds ₹75.6 Income Tax Disallowance Lakh against Interest on Unsecured Loans [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance of interest expenditure of ₹75,63,295 for Assessment Years (AY) 2017–18 and 2018–19 as the assessee...
Total Income 100% Tax-Exempt if S.80P Deduction Allowed: ITAT dismisses appeal noting No Effect on Disallowances [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed the appeal, noting that disallowances made by the Assessing Officer (AO) had no tax effect as the assessee was already...