- Home
- »
- Akhaigha T Josh

Akhaigha T Josh
![ITAT Holds Bona Fide Belief and Lack of Technical Knowledge Constitute Sufficient Cause, Condones 972-Day Delay by 71-Year-Old Assessee [Read Order] ITAT Holds Bona Fide Belief and Lack of Technical Knowledge Constitute Sufficient Cause, Condones 972-Day Delay by 71-Year-Old Assessee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/06/500x300_2102737-itat-bona-fide-belief-lack-of-technical-knowledge-constitute-sufficient-cause-condones-taxscan.webp)
ITAT Holds Bona Fide Belief and Lack of Technical Knowledge Constitute Sufficient Cause, Condones 972-Day Delay by 71-Year-Old Assessee [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has condoned a delay of 972 days in filing an appeal by Mr. Kirtikumar Champaklal...
Absence of SCN and Personal Hearing: Delhi HC Sets Aside Customs Detention of Passenger’s Gold [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has set aside the detention of a passenger’s gold jewellery by the Customs Department at Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi, and ordered the release of the seized...
Delhi HC Dismisses Exporter’s Plea for IGST Refund, Holds Petition Not Maintainable Due to Concealment of Cancelled GST Registration [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking the release of Integrated Goods and Services Tax ( IGST ) refund along with interest and held that the plea was not maintainable due to the...
Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Order for Lack of Reasoned Findings on Functional Comparability in Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has set aside an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for failing to provide adequate reasons while deciding on the functional comparability of entities in ...
Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court held that officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) are indeed “proper officers” under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. As a result, the Court set aside the ...
Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal as Penalty u/s 271E Held Time-Barred: Limitation Starts from AO’s Notice, Not ACIT’s Action [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court reaffirmed in Thapar Homes Pvt. Ltd. that penalty proceedings under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be completed within the statutory limitation period calculated...


![Proceedings Must Comply with Faceless Reassessment Procedure under Amended IT Act: Bombay HC Stays Old Notices [Read Order] Proceedings Must Comply with Faceless Reassessment Procedure under Amended IT Act: Bombay HC Stays Old Notices [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/06/250x150_2102731-faceless-reassessment-reassessment-it-act-bombay-hc-old-notices-taxscan.webp)
![No Gross Negligence or Lack of Bona Fides by Importer: Delhi HC Condones Delay in Filing Appeal Before CESTAT [Read Order] No Gross Negligence or Lack of Bona Fides by Importer: Delhi HC Condones Delay in Filing Appeal Before CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/05/250x150_2102498-bona-fides-delhi-hc-condones-delay-cestat-taxscan.webp)
![GST Registration Restoration Dependent on Verification of New Business Premises and Documents: Delhi HC Directs Fresh Inspection [Read Order] GST Registration Restoration Dependent on Verification of New Business Premises and Documents: Delhi HC Directs Fresh Inspection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/250x150_2102337-gst-registration-verification-new-business-premises-documents-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp)
![Reassessment Notice beyond 3 years Requires Mandatory Approval from PCCIT: ITAT Quashes Notice against Barclays [Read Order] Reassessment Notice beyond 3 years Requires Mandatory Approval from PCCIT: ITAT Quashes Notice against Barclays [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/250x150_2102288-itat-mumbai-reassessment-notice-itat-quashes-taxscan.webp)
![Absence of SCN and Personal Hearing: Delhi HC Sets Aside Customs Detention of Passenger’s Gold [Read Order] Absence of SCN and Personal Hearing: Delhi HC Sets Aside Customs Detention of Passenger’s Gold [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/500x300_2102127-passenger-gold-taxscan.webp)
![Delhi HC Dismisses Exporter’s Plea for IGST Refund, Holds Petition Not Maintainable Due to Concealment of Cancelled GST Registration [Read Order] Delhi HC Dismisses Exporter’s Plea for IGST Refund, Holds Petition Not Maintainable Due to Concealment of Cancelled GST Registration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/500x300_2102002-delhi-hc-exporters-plea-igst-refund-holds-petition-not-maintainable-due-concealment-of-cancelled-gst-registration-txn.webp)
![Personal Jewellery Not Prohibited under Baggage Rules: Delhi HC Orders Release of Bangles [Read Order] Personal Jewellery Not Prohibited under Baggage Rules: Delhi HC Orders Release of Bangles [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/500x300_2102004-personal-jewellery-baggage-rules-delhi-hc-release-of-bangles-taxscan.webp)
![Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Order for Lack of Reasoned Findings on Functional Comparability in Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order] Delhi HC Sets Aside ITAT Order for Lack of Reasoned Findings on Functional Comparability in Transfer Pricing Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/500x300_2101588-delhi-hc-itat-order-reasoned-findings-functional-comparability-transfer-pricing-case-txn.webp)
![Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order] Delhi HC Holds DRI Officers as Proper Authorities under Section 28: Restores Microsoft India’s Customs Appeals for Merit Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/500x300_2101584-delhi-hc-holds-dri-officers-proper-authorities-under-section-28-restores-microsoft-india-customs-appeals-for-merit-hearing-txn.webp)
![Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal as Penalty u/s 271E Held Time-Barred: Limitation Starts from AO’s Notice, Not ACIT’s Action [Read Order] Delhi HC Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal as Penalty u/s 271E Held Time-Barred: Limitation Starts from AO’s Notice, Not ACIT’s Action [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/500x300_2101581-delhi-hc-dismisses-revenues-appeal-penalty-us-271e-limitation-starts-from-ao-notice-acits-action-txn.webp)
