Belated Filing of Form 67 not a Ground to Deny Tax Credit: ITAT directs CIT(A) to allow FTC [Read Order]

ITAT - Form 67 filing deadline - Foreign Tax Credit - Form 67 late filing - taxscan

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chennai Bench, ruled that the belated filing of Form 67 cannot serve as a valid ground for denying Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) to a taxpayer.

The order was delivered by a bench comprising Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) and Manu Kumar Giri (Judicial Member). The appeals were filed by Shri Satishkumar Ekambaram for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20.

Step by Step Guidance for Tax Audit & E-filing, Click Here

The issue arose when the Centralized Processing Center (CPC), Bengaluru, disallowed the taxpayer’s claim for FTC amounting to ₹9.59 lakhs for AY 2018-19. The reason cited was the delayed submission of Form 67, which, under Rule 128(9) of the Income Tax Rules, is required to be filed alongside the income tax return under Section 139(1). The taxpayer filed the form belatedly with a revised return on March 30, 2019, but the claim was rejected.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] supported the CPC’s action, leading the taxpayer to escalate the matter to the ITAT.

Step by Step Guidance for Tax Audit & E-filing, Click Here

The taxpayer’s representative was absent during the hearing, while the respondent was represented by Shri A.R.V. Srinivasan, Additional Commissioner of Income Tax and Senior Departmental Representative.

The ITAT relied on its earlier ruling in ITO vs. Smt. Chengam Durga and the Madras High Court decision in Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy (2022). Both precedents established that the filing of Form 67 is directory in nature and procedural non-compliance should not defeat legitimate claims.

Step by Step Guidance for Tax Audit & E-filing, Click Here

The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to allow the taxpayer’s FTC claim after verifying Form 67, asserting that procedural delays should not undermine substantive rights granted by the law. The decision for AY 2019-20 was aligned with the ruling for AY 2018-19, as both cases presented identical issues.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader