Cabinet approves Amendments to ‘Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill, 2020’

Vivad Se Vishwas Act - Direct Tax Vivad - CBDT - Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill - Income Tax - Taxscan

The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for amendment of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill, 2020, so that its scope can be widened to cover litigation pending in various debt recovery tribunals (DRTs).

Also, in search and seizure procedures, where the recovery is up to ₹5 crore, this scheme can now be availed of once the Bill is amended. Now, the government proposes to widen the scope of the Bill and cover cases pending before debt recovery tribunals and also certain search and seizure cases.

The Vivad se Vishwas scheme was announced by Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman during her budget speech on February 1, 2020.

Key Points

  • The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Bill, 2020 was introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Finance, Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman, on February 5, 2020.  The Bill provides a mechanism for resolution of pending tax disputes related to income tax and corporation tax.
  • Appellant:  The Bill defines an appellant as the income tax authority, or the person, or both, whose appeal is pending before any appellate forum as on January 31, 2020.  These appellate forums are the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, and the Commissioner (Appeals).
  • Resolution mechanism:   The Bill proposes a resolution mechanism under which an appellant can file a declaration to the designated authority to initiate resolution of pending direct tax disputes.   The last date to file such declaration will be notified by the central government.  Based on the declaration, the designated authority will determine the amount payable by the appellant against the dispute and grant a certificate, containing particulars of the amount payable, within 15 days of the receipt of the declaration.  The appellant must pay this amount within 15 days of the receipt of the certificate and inform the designated authority of such payment.  Such an amount will not be refundable.
  • Once the designated authority issues the certificate, appeals pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals and the Commissioner (Appeals) will be deemed to be withdrawn.  In case of appeals or petitions pending before the Supreme Court and High Courts, the appellant is required to withdraw the appeal or petition.
  • The Principal Chief Commissioner will designate an officer, not below the rank of a Commissioner of Income Tax, as the designated authority to manage the proposed resolution mechanism.
  • The amount payable for resolution:  The amount payable by the appellant for resolution of disputes is determined based on whether the dispute relates to the payment of tax, or payment of interest, penalty, or fee.  Further, he is required to pay an additional amount if such payment is made after March 31, 2020.  Table 1 shows the amount payable by the appellant for dispute resolution.

Table 1:  Amount payable for resolution of disputes

Disputes relating to Payable before March 31, 2020 The additional amount payable after March 31, 2020
Payment of tax Amount of disputed tax

(any interest or penalty associated with such tax will be waived)

(i) 10% of the amount of disputed tax, or (ii) interest and penalty relating to that tax, whichever is lower
Payment of fee, interest, or penalty 25% of the amount under such dispute Another 5% of the amount under such dispute
  • Waiver of rights:  For dispute resolution, the appellant is required to furnish an undertaking waiving his rights to seek any remedy or claim in relation to that dispute under any law, including the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act).  All such claims already filed in relation to the dispute must be withdrawn before filing the declaration.
  • Immunity to appellant:  Once a dispute is resolved, the designated authority cannot levy interest or penalty in relation to that dispute.  Further, no appellate forum can make a decision in relation to the matter of dispute once it is resolved.  Such matters cannot be reopened in any proceeding under any law, including the IT Act.
  • Revival of disputes:  The declaration filed by an appellant will become invalid if: (i) its particulars are found to be false, (ii) he violates any of the conditions referred to in the IT Act, or (iii) he seeks any remedy or claim in relation to that dispute.  Consequently, all proceedings and claims withdrawn based on the declaration will be deemed to have been revived.

Disputes not covered:  The proposed mechanism will not cover certain disputes.  These include disputes: (i) where prosecution has been initiated before the declaration is filed, (ii) which involve persons who have been convicted or are being prosecuted for offences under certain laws (such as the Indian Penal Code), or for enforcement of civil liabilities, and (iii) involving undisclosed foreign income or assets.