CBDT issues SOP for Filing of Appeals & SLPs by Income Tax Department in Supreme Court [Read Circular]

The Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) has issued Standard Operating Proceedure ( SOP ) for filing of Appeals & SLPs by Income Tax Department in Supreme Court.

Several instructions and directions have been issued by the CBDT from time to time emphasizing upon the need for timely filing of appeals/SLPs in the Supreme Court and proper conduct of litigation. However, a number of SLPs are being filed with inordinate delay.

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s directions to adopt Information and Communication Technology (ICT) initiatives to streamline, monitor and provide seamless integration of all stages in government revenue litigation across the board, a LIMBS Committee and a High-Powered Committee was constituted.

The High-Powered Committee has suggested to the board for changes in SLP proposal initiation, timely sending of SLP proposal to DoLA and use of single file instead of initiating fresh files through e-office by different authorities to cut down the delay.

The High Powered Committee has advised the Board to work towards a “Zero Delay Regime” in the matter of filing of appeals/SLPs.

In view of the above and with a view to ensure filing of appeals/SLPs within the period prescribed, following instructions were issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT )in supersession of all earlier instructions on the subject.

The important aspects covered in the Standard Operating Procedure are as follows: –

Timelines for processing of proposals for filing SLPs

With a view to ensure timely filing of appeals/SLPs in the Supreme Court, the timelines for processing proposals at different levels are modified and enclosed as per Annexure-A, for strict adherence by all concerned.

Responsibility to ensure timely processing of proposals

The Pr.CCIT/CCIT and Pr.CIT/CIT concerned shall ensure timely processing of proposals and their submission to the Directorate of L&R as per the timelines given in Annexure A. Any deviation from the timelines will have to be duly explained and delay without proper explanation or due to negligence will be viewed adversely.

Institutional mechanism for processing proposals for appeals/ SLPs to the Supreme Court

i.The Pr. CCIT/CCIT having jurisdiction over the station having Bench of the High Court, shall ensure a proper institutional mechanism for timely dissemination of downloaded copy/certified copy of High Court’s order/judgment, whichever is available first, to Pr.CsIT/CsIT having jurisdiction over respective cases.

Ii. The Pr. CCIT/CCIT, shall set-up a High Court Cell at each station within their jurisdiction where a Bench of the High Court is situated. Such a cell shall be headed by a DCIT/ACIT/ITO (as decided by the Pr. CCIT/CCIT, depending upon availability of manpower and the workload) with adequate number of Inspectors and other support staff and appropriate infrastructural facilities to make it properly functional. Appropriate monitoring and supervision mechanism of the High Court Cell shall be prescribed by the Pr. CCIT/CCIT under intimation to the Pr. DGlT (L&R).

iii.The High Court Cell shall obtain particulars of cases finally heard from Standing Counsels at the end of each working day and intimate particulars of the cases, such as the name of the case, Assessment Year, Name of the Standing Counsel etc. with a summary of the proceedings to the Pr. CIT/CIT concerned without any delay. For outstation Pr. CsIT/ CsIT, such information shall be sent through e-mail/Fax.

Iv. The Cell shall also track orders/judgments pronounced on a daily basis. Such information should be compiled from the daily cause list, Senior Standing Counsels and from the Court room/registry of the High Court. The information so compiled should be transmitted to Pr. CIT/CIT concerned immediately on a regular basis through personal delivery/e-mail/fax.

V. The Administrative Pr. CsIT/CsIT shall also set up proper institutional mechanisms in their respective charges to access the website of the High Coun to download orders/Judgments relating to their charge as soon as these are uploaded. The orders can be downloaded from websites such as www.indiancoutts.nic.in or www.courtnic.nic.in where link Of all High Courts is provided. An officer of the charge should be nominated for this purpose. Such officers shall access the website everyday and keep a log of the same. The nominated officer shall also maintain regular coordination with the High Coun Cell(s) dealing with the cases of the charge.

Processing of proposals for appeal/SLP on receipt of the order of High Courts

The following important issues need to be noted in processing proposals for SLPs for due

compliance:

i. For filing SLP, the period of limitation begins from the date of judgment/order of the High Court.

ii. In case an application for grant of certificate of fitness u/s 261 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is made, the limitation to file Civil Appeal/SLP is 60 days from disposal of the application.

iii. The proposal for SLP against the High Court’s order shall be initiated on the basis of an ordinary copy/ the copy of the order downloaded from the website (as referred to above) of the Court without waiting for the certified copy of the Older. The certified copy of the order shall be sent separately as soon as it is received to determine the exact date of limitation. The timeline for processing the SLP proposal at the level of Pr.CIT concerned, shall not in any case, exceed 20 days from the date of judgment.

Iv. In order to avoid delay, the Pr.CCIT/Pr.CsIT should consider the SLP proposals as per their judicial appreciation of the impugned order/judgment of the High Court and need not seek

legal opinion in every case flom the Standing Counsels as the Ministry of Law & Justice

and Ld. Law officers of the Government of India are consulted in appropriate cases before

filing the SLPs.

v. The process of filing SLP proposal should invariably be initiated only at the level of

jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner in the field. Pr.CIT/CIT is the

custodian of all the records while litigation in High Court is on and is responsible for

initiating the process for filing of SLP.

vi. After due consideration, the proposal for SLP must be sent by the Pr. CsIT/CsIT to the

Directorate of Income-tax (L&R) within the time-limits prescribed in Annexure-A. In case

of delay, detailed justification should be furnished along with the corrective action taken to

prevent recurrence Of delay in future.

vii. The revised Proforma B, enclosed as Annexure B to this instruction, duly filled-in along

with one set of required documents annexed to it, should be sent with the proposal. The

proposal along with soft copy of all annexures is to be sent to the Directorate of L&R

necessarily through email / e-office.

SLP filed by the assessee

If the Hon’ble Supreme Court directs issue of notice on the SLP filed by the assessee,

Registry of the Supreme Court serves the notice along with the Special Leave Petition to the

respondent Pr.CIT/CIT or other respondent officer directly. The Pr.CIT/CIT or such other respondent officer, through his Pr.CIT/CIT, should submit the following documents to the Directorate of Income-tax (L&R) for entering appearance before the Court and for filing

counter affidavit:

i. A copy of the notice along with the paper book by the Registry.

ii. Para wise comments on the Special Leave Petition placed in the paper book.

iii. A Vakalatnama duly executed in favour of Assistant Government Advocate, Central Agency

Section, Ministry of Law.

The aforesaid documents should be submitted strictly within three weeks from the receipt of the

notice to the Directorates of Legal and Research.

Processing of SLP proposals in the Directorate of L%R

The Pr. DGlT (L&R) shall ensure the following:

i. After due consideration of the proposal within the Directorate of L&R, the proposal is sent

to the Ministry of Law within 20 days of the receipt, if approved by the Board and;

ii. Time-lines mentioned in the Annexure-A to this Instruction for timely filing of SLPs are

adhered to strictly.

Compliance of directions of Hon ‘ble Supreme Court

Directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court must be complied with, within the time allowed. The Pr.CIT/CIT shall personally ensure compliance of directions relating to Dasti service, filing of counter or rejoinder affidavit or other specific directions, to avoid adverse observations.

Quality of SLP Proposals

1. The quality of proposal sent by the Pr.CIT/CIT is extremely important for efficient and

effective litigation management in the Department. The Pr.CIT/CIT must ensure that the

complete proforma B along with all requisite documents is submitted along with the SLP

proposal. Any deficiency in this regard causes avoidable delays in processing of the proposals.

2. It must also be noted that appeal to the High Court and the Supreme Court can be filed

only on ‘Substantial Questions of Law’. It has, however, been observed that many SLP proposals involve only ‘questions of fact’. The CCsIT shall ensure that the proposals for SLPs are well examined and forwarded to the Directorate of L&R only in those cases where ‘substantial questions of law’ are involved.

3. All High Court orders which are against the revenue but found acceptable by the Pr. Commissioner/Commissioner will be put up to the jurisdictional Chief Commissioner within 15

days of pronouncement of the judgment for his concurrence. In case, the CCIT directs submission of SLP proposal in a case, the same shall be done within time frame prescribed in

Annexure A.

Assistance to Law Officers/Appearing Counsels

The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned should ensure that the Law Officer/Appearing Counsel

representing the case is briefed properly before the hearing. Whenever, Law officer/Appearing

Counsel seek instructions/clarifications in a case, the same must be provided by the Pr.CIT/CIT

on priority.

Monitoring Compliance of this Instruction

1. The Pr. DGlT (L&R) shall monitor the compliance of timelines for submission of SLP

proposals and send a quarterly report to the Member (A&J), CBDT giving a list of cases where the proposal for filing SLP was received beyond the prescribed time lines. Due dates of the quarterly reports are – 15th July, 15th October, 15th January and 15th April. The report shall indicate the Pr.CCIT/CCIT region, the Pr.CIT/CIT charge and number of days of delay along with the action taken and/or proposed to be taken.

2. In the quarterly report, the Pr. DGlT (L&R) shall also report cases of delays beyond the

prescribed timelines for:

i. Sending the SLP to Ministry of Law;

ii. Vetting of draft SLP; and

iii. Filing of SLP by the CAS after vetting.

Reasons of delay in such matters and the steps taken/proposed to be taken shall also be

mentioned in the report. Delays, if any, on the part of counsels and CAS etc. shall be brought out clearly to be taken up with the Law Ministry appropriately.

Applicability of Instruction

This Instruction shall apply in respect of the orders/judgments of High Courts pronounced on or after the date of issue of this Instruction. Necessary concurrence of the Ministry of Law & Justice has been obtained.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates