In compliance of the order of Supreme Court of India dated April 16, 2021 passed in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 2/2020 titled “In Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881”, the Chhattisgarh High Court issued Practice Directions.
As per the directions the Magistrates having jurisdiction to try offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.L. Act), shall record cogent and sufficient reasons before converting a complaint under Section 138 of the N.L. Act from summary trial to summons trial in exercise of power under the second proviso of section 143 of N.L. Act. Due care and caution shall be exercised in this regard and the conversion of summary trial to summons trial shall not be in a mechanical manner.
The High Court directed that on receipt of any such complaint under Section 138 of N.L. Act, wherever it is found that any accused is resident of the area beyond the territorial Jurisdiction of the Magistrate concerned, an inquiry shall be conducted by the Magistrate to arrive at sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused as prescribed under Section 202 Cr.P.C.
While conducting any such Inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C., the evidence of witnesses on behalf of the complainant shall be permitted to be taken on affidavit. In suitable cases, the Magistrate may restrict the inquiry to examination of documents for satisfaction as to the sufficiency of grounds for proceeding under the said provision.
Further, Trial Court shall treat service of summons in one complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act Forming part of a transaction, as deemed service in respect of all complaints filed before the same Court relating to dishonor of cheques issued as part of the same transaction.
Trial Courts have no inherent power to review or recall the issue of summons in relation to complaints filed under Section 138 of N.L. Act. However, the same shall not affect the power of the Trial Court under Section 322 of Cr.P.C. to revisit the order of issue of process in case it is brought to the court’s notice that it lacks jurisdiction to try the complaint.
“Section 258 of Cr.P.C. has no applicability to complaints under Section 138 of N.I. Act. The words “as far as may be” in Section 143 are used only in respect of applicability of Sections 262 to 265 of the Code and the summary procedure to be followed for trials under the said Code. The Appellate Courts before which appeals against the judgments in complaint under Section 138 of NL. Act pending are directed to make an effort to settle the dispute through mediation,” the Chhattisgarh High Court directed.
Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the JudgmentSupport our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan AdFree. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates.
