Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]

Cogent evidence - penalty - Central Excise Act - CESTAT - taxscan

The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cogent evidence is needed to establish a charge against clandestine removal and no penalty sustained under section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act The appeal was furnished related to the dropping of demand of Rs. 9,94,65,997/- by the Commissioner…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan AdFree

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹599 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

Commissioner, Customs & Central Excise vs Prakash Industries Limited

Counsel for Appellant:   Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh

Counsel for Respondent:   Shri Rohit Choudhary & Ms. Preeti Khiwani


Related Stories