- Home
- »
- Aiswarya Krishnadas

Aiswarya Krishnadas
![Denial of Increased Material / Wage Costs and GST Claim: Patna HC Remands case to BUIDCo’s Chief General Manager [Read Order] Denial of Increased Material / Wage Costs and GST Claim: Patna HC Remands case to BUIDCo’s Chief General Manager [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GST-Goods-service-tax-Patna-high-court-Patna-hc-remands-case-GST-claim-TAXSCAN.jpg)
Denial of Increased Material / Wage Costs and GST Claim: Patna HC Remands case to BUIDCo’s Chief General Manager [Read Order]
The Patna High Court has remanded the case concerning the denial of increased material, wage costs, and Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) claims back to...
Delay in issuance of GST Refund u/s 54: Delhi HC directs Proper officer to Expedite Processing of Refund [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has directed the proper officer to expedite the processing of the GST refund under Section 54 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, ( CGST ) 2017, due to delays in its issuance. ...
Refund u/s 11B of Central Excise Act not Refundable if Taxpayer cannot Utilize Cenvat Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has ruled that refund under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act is not applicable if the taxpayer was unable...
Filing of Enquiry Report within 90 Days under Customs Regulation 20 (5) of CBLR, 2013 is Directory: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the filing of an enquiry report within 90 days under Customs Regulation 20(5) of Customs Broker Licensing and Regulation (CBLR), 2013 was directory, not...
Taxpayer Explained source of Money for Purchase of Gold: CESTAT deletes Penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has deleted the penalty under section 112 of the Customs Act after the taxpayer provided an explanation regarding...
Construction of Residential Complex is properly Classifiable under head WCS u/s 65(105): CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has determined that the construction of a residential complex is properly classifiable under the head "Works...
No provision for Refund in Cash for Tax paid / Credit taken on Input: CESTAT upholds Rejection Refund Cash [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the rejection of refund in cash for tax paid or credit taken on input, citing the absence of provision...