Aiswarya Krishnadas
![Software Project Abandoned with No Enduring Benefit, Expenses treated as Revenue in Nature: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Service-Tax-Leviable-Services-Nature-Software-Development-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Software Project Abandoned with No Enduring Benefit, Expenses treated as Revenue in Nature: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]")
Software Project Abandoned with No Enduring Benefit, Expenses treated as Revenue in Nature: ITAT Deletes Addition [Read Order]
The two member bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad ruled that expenses incurred on a software project, which was ultimately...
![AO incorrectly invokes Section 69A and Charges Tax u/s 115 BBE of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Section-69A-AO-Incorrectly-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-deletes-addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO incorrectly invokes Section 69A and Charges Tax u/s 115 BBE of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]")
![Failure to Disclose Loan, Repayment or Interest Paid to Creditor: ITAT upholds Addition of Rs. 1.30 crores [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-loan-repayment-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Disclose Loan, Repayment or Interest Paid to Creditor: ITAT upholds Addition of Rs. 1.30 crores [Read Order]")
![Cancellation of GST Registration does not Exempt Taxpayers from Statutory Non-Compliance or Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-GST-Registration-Cancellation-of-GST-Registration-Delhi-High-Court-GST-reistration-cancellation-taxscan.jpg "Cancellation of GST Registration does not Exempt Taxpayers from Statutory Non-Compliance or Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![AO Fails assuming 8% of Unsecured Loans from Non-Members as Net Profit: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-AO-Net-Profit-Unsecured-Loans-Taxscan.jpg "AO Fails assuming 8% of Unsecured Loans from Non-Members as Net Profit: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]")
SCN Fails to Provide Specific Details on Alleged Fraud or Misstatement: Delhi HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has set aside the cancellation of Goods and Service Tax registration, ruling that the Show Cause Notice ( SCN ) failed to provide specific details regarding...
![SCN Fails to Provide Specific Details on Alleged Fraud or Misstatement: Delhi HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-SCN-Fails-Cases-Cancellation-of-GST-Registration-TAXSCAN.jpg "SCN Fails to Provide Specific Details on Alleged Fraud or Misstatement: Delhi HC Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]")
54th GST Council Recommends to prospectively Omit rule 96(10), rule 89(4A) & rule 89(4B) from CGST Rules, 2017
The Council, which included state finance ministers and tax officials, will review the 54th GST Council's recommendation to prospectively remove Rule 96(10), Rule 89(4A), and Rule 89(4B) from the...
Taxpayer is Eligible for Deduction u/s 80IA (4) for Operating and Maintaining Infrastructure Facility: ITAT [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)Â has ruled that the taxpayer is eligible for a deduction amounting to Rs. 295,58,08,285 under Section 80IA(4) of...
![Taxpayer is Eligible for Deduction u/s 80IA (4) for Operating and Maintaining Infrastructure Facility: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Taxpayer-Deduction-Operating-and-Maintaining-Infrastructure-Facility-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Taxpayer is Eligible for Deduction u/s 80IA (4) for Operating and Maintaining Infrastructure Facility: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after the assessee demonstrated "sufficient cause" for...
![ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Penalty-Demonstrates-Sufficient-Cause-Quantum-Appeal-Penalty-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]")
ITAT Remands Case to AO after CIT (A) Rejects ITR and other Documents Linked to Unexplained Cash Credits from Relatives [Read Order]
The two-member bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, remanded the case to the Assessing Officer after the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] failed to verify the...
![ITAT Remands Case to AO after CIT (A) Rejects ITR and other Documents Linked to Unexplained Cash Credits from Relatives [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-AO-CIT-A-ITR-Unexplained-Cash-Credits-from-Relatives-thaxscan.jpg "ITAT Remands Case to AO after CIT (A) Rejects ITR and other Documents Linked to Unexplained Cash Credits from Relatives [Read Order]")
No Addition u/s 68 in Partnership Firm’s Hands if Credit is in Partner’s Capital Account: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that no addition is permissible under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the hands of the partnership firm but can only...
![No Addition u/s 68 in Partnership Firm’s Hands if Credit is in Partner’s Capital Account: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Addition-Partnership-Firm-Capital-Account-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Addition u/s 68 in Partnership Firm’s Hands if Credit is in Partner’s Capital Account: ITAT [Read Order]")