Antony Berli
![No evidence to prove collection of charges for providing Club or Association Services to members: CESTAT quashes service tax demand on Punjab Cricket Association [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-evidence-prove-collection-charges-providing-Club-Association-Services-members-CESTAT-service-tax-demand-Punjab-Cricket-Association-TAXSCAN.jpg "No evidence to prove collection of charges for providing Club or Association Services to members: CESTAT quashes service tax demand on Punjab Cricket Association [Read Order]")
No evidence to prove collection of charges for providing Club or Association Services to members: CESTAT quashes service tax demand on Punjab Cricket Association [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Punjab Cricket Association (PCA) for...
![CESTAT quashes Rejection of Appeal on Payment of Mandatory Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CESTAT-Rejection-Pre-Deposit-Chandigarh-bench-Municipal-Council-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Rejection of Appeal on Payment of Mandatory Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
![Relief to Johnson Lifts Pvt Ltd: Order for Payment of Service Tax not Justified on Payment of VAT, rules CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Relief-to-Johnson-Lifts-Pvt-Ltd-Johnson-Lifts-Pvt-Ltd-Order-for-Payment-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Payment-of-VAT-VAT-CESTAT-taxscan-.jpg "Relief to Johnson Lifts Pvt Ltd: Order for Payment of Service Tax not Justified on Payment of VAT, rules CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Refund of 4% SAD Allowable on Imported Goods as no Requirement that VAT Chelan should show Bill of Entry: CESTAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Refund-of-4-SAD-Allowable-on-Imported-Goods-as-no-Requirement-VAT-Chelan-should-show-Bill-of-Entry-CESTAT-Quashes-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Refund of 4% SAD Allowable on Imported Goods as no Requirement that VAT Chelan should show Bill of Entry: CESTAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]")
![Section 56(2)(vii)(3) of Income Tax Act Not Applicable for Bonus Shares: ITAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Income-Tax-Act-Applicable-Bonus-Shares-ITAT-Appeal-TAXSCAN-1.webp "Section 56(2)(vii)(3) of Income Tax Act Not Applicable for Bonus Shares: ITAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]")
Documents showing Commissions Paid to Foreign Agents for Exporting Goods not Submitted on time: CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) denied the appeal by N. M. Zackriah & Co. (the Appellant) for exemption of service tax for the payments made to...
![Documents showing Commissions Paid to Foreign Agents for Exporting Goods not Submitted on time: CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Documents-Commissions-Paid-to-Foreign-Agents-for-Exporting-Goods-not-Submitted-on-time-CESTAT-Denies-Service-Tax-Exemption-TAXSCAN.jpg "Documents showing Commissions Paid to Foreign Agents for Exporting Goods not Submitted on time: CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption [Read Order]")
Section 56(2)(vii)(3) of Income Tax Act Not Applicable for Bonus Shares: ITAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of ITAT quashed the appeal by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT), (the appellant) for levying Income tax from Aruna Chandhok, (the respondent) for the bonus shares she...
![Section 56(2)(vii)(3) of Income Tax Act Not Applicable for Bonus Shares: ITAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Income-Tax-Act-Applicable-Bonus-Shares-ITAT-Appeal-TAXSCAN.webp "Section 56(2)(vii)(3) of Income Tax Act Not Applicable for Bonus Shares: ITAT quashes Appeal [Read Order]")
Confirmation of excise duty at 8% or 10% of value exempted goods without merit: CESTAT allows appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal by Ref Cem Industries (the appellant) against the order issued by the Commissioner of Central...
![Confirmation of excise duty at 8% or 10% of value exempted goods without merit: CESTAT allows appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Confirmation-of-excise-duty-value-exempted-goods-without-merit-CESTAT-allows-appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Confirmation of excise duty at 8% or 10% of value exempted goods without merit: CESTAT allows appeal [Read Order]")
Failure to Show Collusion for Exporting Red Sanders Wood SCN: CESTAT Reduces Penalty u/s 114(1) of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the show cause notice (SCN) issued by the Commissioner failed to show collusion for the export and reduced...
![Failure to Show Collusion for Exporting Red Sanders Wood SCN: CESTAT Reduces Penalty u/s 114(1) of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-Show-Collusion-Red-Sanders-Wood-SCN-CESTAT-Penalty-Customs-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Show Collusion for Exporting Red Sanders Wood SCN: CESTAT Reduces Penalty u/s 114(1) of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Confirmation of Excise Duty at 8% or 10% of value Exempted Goods without merit: CESTAT allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of Central, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeal by Ref Cem Industries (the appellant) against the order issued by the Commissioner of Central...
![Confirmation of Excise Duty at 8% or 10% of value Exempted Goods without merit: CESTAT allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Confirmation-excise-duty-value-exempted-goods-merit-CESTAT-appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Confirmation of Excise Duty at 8% or 10% of value Exempted Goods without merit: CESTAT allows Appeal [Read Order]")
Fees paid to USFDA for Approval of Medicament is Service under Finance Act, liable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmadabad bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the fees paid by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd (the appellant) to the United States Food and Drug...
![Fees paid to USFDA for Approval of Medicament is Service under Finance Act, liable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Fees-paid-USFDA-Approval-Medicament-Service-Finance-Act-liable-Service-Tax-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Fees paid to USFDA for Approval of Medicament is Service under Finance Act, liable to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")