Eeva Mary Sanil
![ITAT rules Section 115JB Inapplicable to SBI for AY 2006-07, Exempts Banks from MAT Provisions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Section-115JB-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT rules Section 115JB Inapplicable to SBI for AY 2006-07, Exempts Banks from MAT Provisions [Read Order]")
ITAT rules Section 115JB Inapplicable to SBI for AY 2006-07, Exempts Banks from MAT Provisions [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), provided relief to the State Bank of India (SBI) in an appeal concerning the...
![Tax Exemption Denied u/s 12AB Due to Lack of Proof of Charitable Activities: ITAT Orders Fresh Review [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Income-tax-exemption-rejection.jpg "Tax Exemption Denied u/s 12AB Due to Lack of Proof of Charitable Activities: ITAT Orders Fresh Review [Read Order]")
![No PE in India, Offshore Supply of Telecom Commodities Contracts Not Taxable : Delhi HC Rules in Nokia’s Tax Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/No-PE-in-India-Offshore-Supply-of-Telecom-Commodities-Offshore-Supply-Telecom-Commodities-Contracts-Delhi-HC-Delhi-HC-Rules-taxscan.jpg "No PE in India, Offshore Supply of Telecom Commodities Contracts Not Taxable : Delhi HC Rules in Nokia’s Tax Matter [Read Order]")
![Relief to LG Electronics: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Call Centre Services for After-Sales Support [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/LG-Electronics.jpg "Relief to LG Electronics: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Call Centre Services for After-Sales Support [Read Order]")
![Standard Form for Waiver of SCN and Personal Hearing Not a Substitute for Statutory Obligation: Delhi HC rules Seizure Without SCN Illegal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Delhi-High-Court-SCN-SCN-Illegal-taxscan.jpg "Standard Form for Waiver of SCN and Personal Hearing Not a Substitute for Statutory Obligation: Delhi HC rules Seizure Without SCN Illegal [Read Order]")
![ITAT Weekly Round-Up [Feb 22nd-Feb 28th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-Income-tax-news-income-tax-updates-income-tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Weekly Round-Up [Feb 22nd-Feb 28th,2025]")
Failure to Consider Assessee's Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) after it erroneously dismissed the...
![Failure to Consider Assessees Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-11.jpg "Failure to Consider Assessees Delay Condonation Request u/s 249(3): ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
Export Proceeded after Customs Clearance and Receival of Foreign Remittance: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 114 [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) recently held that a penalty cannot be imposed if there is no customs violation. It observed that the export...
![Export Proceeded after Customs Clearance and Receival of Foreign Remittance: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 114 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Foreign-Remittance-Penalty-Customs-Clearance-taxscan.jpg "Export Proceeded after Customs Clearance and Receival of Foreign Remittance: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 114 [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Amendment of Section 80AC Not Retrospective: ITAT Allows 80P Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/80P-Deduction.jpg "Income Tax Amendment of Section 80AC Not Retrospective: ITAT Allows 80P Deduction [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271D: Penalty Held Invalid as Section 153C Assessment Quashed due to Lack of Incriminating Material [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside a penalty of ₹3,50,000 imposed under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT) initially...
![ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271D: Penalty Held Invalid as Section 153C Assessment Quashed due to Lack of Incriminating Material [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Penalty-Held-Invalid-Section-153C-Assessment-Quashed-Assessment-Quashed-due-Lack-of-Incriminating-Material-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271D: Penalty Held Invalid as Section 153C Assessment Quashed due to Lack of Incriminating Material [Read Order]")
ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and remanded the case for fresh...
![ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Hindu-Undivided-Family-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Re-examine Gift from HUF Under Section 56(2)(vii) of Income Tax Act 1961 [Read Order]")
![ITAT Weekly Round-Up [Feb 15th-Feb 21st,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-weekly-round-up.webp "ITAT Weekly Round-Up [Feb 15th-Feb 21st,2025]")