Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Fathima Karama A.M
![Enforceability of Agreement to Sale cannot be denied Unless Fresh Affidavits are Verified: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Enforceability-of-Agreement-to-Sale-Unless-Fresh-Affidavits-are-Verified-ITAT-deletes-Addition-us-69-TAXSCAN.jpg "Enforceability of Agreement to Sale cannot be denied Unless Fresh Affidavits are Verified: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]")
Enforceability of Agreement to Sale cannot be denied Unless Fresh Affidavits are Verified: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 holding that the...
![Ownership of Equipment in Bandwidth Selling Business: ITAT upholds Reduction in Profit eligible for Deduction in Revenue Sharing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Ownership-of-Equipment-in-Bandwidth-Selling-Business-Ownership-of-Equipment-Equipment-Selling-Business-ITAT-upholds-Reduction-ITAT-Deduction-in-Revenue-Sharing-Deduction-Revenue-Sharing-taxscan-.jpg "Ownership of Equipment in Bandwidth Selling Business: ITAT upholds Reduction in Profit eligible for Deduction in Revenue Sharing [Read Order]")
![No Cogent and Satisfactory Explanation u/s 5 of Limitation Act: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 781 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Cogent-and-Satisfactory-Explanation-Limitation-Act-ITAT-ITAT-Refuses-to-Condone-Delay-of-781-Days-Condone-Delay-taxscan.jpg "No Cogent and Satisfactory Explanation u/s 5 of Limitation Act: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 781 Days [Read Order]")
![AO not bound to Make Enquiry unless Assessee has Discharged Initial Onus u/s 68: ITAT Upholds Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AO-not-bound-to-Make-Enquiry-unless-Assessee-has-Discharged-Initial-Onus-us-68-ITAT-Upholds-Addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO not bound to Make Enquiry unless Assessee has Discharged Initial Onus u/s 68: ITAT Upholds Addition [Read Order]")
![Corpus Donations Received by Unregistered Trusts are not Taxable unless Verified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Corpus-Donations-Received-by-Unregistered-Trusts-Corpus-Donations-Unregistered-Trusts-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Corpus Donations Received by Unregistered Trusts are not Taxable unless Verified: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Violation of Procedural Norm does not Extinguish Substantive Right to Claim FTC: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Violation-of-Procedural-Norm-Claim-FTC-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Violation of Procedural Norm does not Extinguish Substantive Right to Claim FTC: ITAT [Read Order]")
Late Deposit of Employees' Share of PF/ESI Contribution to Relevant Fund: ITAT Upholds Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance under Section 143 (1)(a) of the Income Tax Act because of the late deposit of the employee's share of...
![Late Deposit of Employees Share of PF/ESI Contribution to Relevant Fund: ITAT Upholds Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Late-Deposit-of-Employees-Deposit-Share-of-PF-PF-ESI-Contribution-to-Relevant-Fund-ITAT-Upholds-Disallowance-ITAT-Disallowance-Taxscan.jpg "Late Deposit of Employees Share of PF/ESI Contribution to Relevant Fund: ITAT Upholds Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) [Read Order]")
![S.56(2)(vii) cannot be Invoked if Property is Purchased for more than Circle Rate: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Property-Property-is-Purchased-Circle-Rate-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "S.56(2)(vii) cannot be Invoked if Property is Purchased for more than Circle Rate: ITAT [Read Order]")
![AO Justified in Rectification of Apparent Error Instead of Substituting the Same: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AO-Justified-in-Rectification-Rectification-of-Apparent-Error-Rectification-Apparent-Error-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO Justified in Rectification of Apparent Error Instead of Substituting the Same: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance of Notice not Deliberate: ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Non-Compliance-of-Notice-not-Deliberate-Notice-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-ITAT-Penalty-Non-Compliance-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Notice not Deliberate: ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]")
Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the capital gain exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax could not be denied on inadvertent and bonafide typographical...
![Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Capital-Gain-Exemption-Inadvertent-Inadvertent-and-Bonafide-Typographical-Error-Typographical-Error-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]")
Meritorious Case cannot be Thrown out at Threshold, When Proper Documents are Produced: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabed Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a meritorious case could not be thrown at threshold when proper documents are produced. Assessee Narasimha Rao Venkata...
![Meritorious Case cannot be Thrown out at Threshold, When Proper Documents are Produced: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Meritorious-Case-cannot-be-Thrown-out-at-Threshold-When-Proper-Documents-are-Produced-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Meritorious Case cannot be Thrown out at Threshold, When Proper Documents are Produced: ITAT [Read Order]")