Franklin Joshva
![Non-Appearance Due to Accounts Team Employees Exit from Company: ITAT Imposes ₹5,000 Penalty and Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Mumbai-income-tax-news-Income-tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Appearance Due to Accounts Team Employees Exit from Company: ITAT Imposes ₹5,000 Penalty and Remands Matter [Read Order]")
Non-Appearance Due to Accounts Team Employee's Exit from Company: ITAT Imposes ₹5,000 Penalty and Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded matters to the Commissioner of Income Tax (appeals)[CIT(A)] considering that the...
![ITAT Grants Exemption u/s 10(10B) for VRS Compensation Citing Central Government-Approved Scheme Benefiting Employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Chandigarh-Income-tax-income-tax-news-ITAT-Grants-Exemption-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Grants Exemption u/s 10(10B) for VRS Compensation Citing Central Government-Approved Scheme Benefiting Employees [Read Order]")
![AO Correctly allows Deduction u/s 80IA even Depreciation claimed less than limit: ITAT quashes PCITs Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Deduction.jpg "AO Correctly allows Deduction u/s 80IA even Depreciation claimed less than limit: ITAT quashes PCITs Revision Order [Read Order]")
![Revenue Challenges ₹2.41 Crore Deletion by CIT(A): ITAT Confirms Stamp Paper Purchases for Customer as Source, Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Revenue-Challenges-Deletion-by-CITA-CITA-ITAT-ITAT-Confirms-Stamp-Paper-Purchases-Stamp-Paper-Stamp-Paper-Purchases-Customer-as-Source-taxscan.jpg "Revenue Challenges ₹2.41 Crore Deletion by CIT(A): ITAT Confirms Stamp Paper Purchases for Customer as Source, Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
![Creditors Written Off and Discount Receipts Linked to Business Income Taxable at Only 8% of Their Value: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-Business-Income-Taxsacan.jpg "Creditors Written Off and Discount Receipts Linked to Business Income Taxable at Only 8% of Their Value: ITAT [Read Order]")
CIT(A) Ignored CBDT Relief for Delayed ITR Filing: ITAT Remands Matter Back for Order Rectification [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter back to CIT(A) for rectification order citing a circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which granted relief...
![CIT(A) Ignored CBDT Relief for Delayed ITR Filing: ITAT Remands Matter Back for Order Rectification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Chennai-Bench-of-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Central-Board-of-Direct-Taxes-CIT-CBDT-Relief-for-Delayed-ITR-Filing-ITR-Filing-ITAT-Remands-Matter-CBDT-CPC-return-of-income-and-audit-report-ITR-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Ignored CBDT Relief for Delayed ITR Filing: ITAT Remands Matter Back for Order Rectification [Read Order]")
Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Quashed the order of the commissioner for denying cross-examination opportunity citing that it is in violation of...
![Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Excise-Demand-Order-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-cross-examination-opportunity-citing-Excise-Duty-and-imposed-penalties-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]")
Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wife's Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the assessing officer (AO) to approve the deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act for the property purchased in the wife’s...
![Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wifes Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Directs-AO-ITAT-Directs-ITR-CIT-Delhi-High-Court-under-section-54F-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-immovable-property-AO-Taxscan.jpg "Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wifes Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]")
Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled the investigation faulty due to the department failing to verify the veracity of documents with key parties like...
![Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Dept.-Fails-to-Verify-Document-CESTAT-CESTAT-Rules-Investigation-Faulty-suppliers-buyers-transporters-agents-veracity-of-documents-show-cause-notice-supplier-of-raw-materials-Kolkata-Taxscan.jpg "Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]")
Relief to TATA Beverages: CESTAT Rules SCN Issued in 2010 for Alleged IPR Service Invalid as Business Transfer Details Disclosed in 2005 [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued in 2010 for alleged IPR service was invalid citing that the business...
![Relief to TATA Beverages: CESTAT Rules SCN Issued in 2010 for Alleged IPR Service Invalid as Business Transfer Details Disclosed in 2005 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-TATA-TATA-Global-Beverages-Ltd-taxscan.jpg "Relief to TATA Beverages: CESTAT Rules SCN Issued in 2010 for Alleged IPR Service Invalid as Business Transfer Details Disclosed in 2005 [Read Order]")
Relief for TATA Steel: CESTAT Declares Excise Demand Notice Issued After 9.5 Years as Time-Barred, Exceeding 5 Years Limit- [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the demand notice issued after 9.5 years exceeding the time limit of 5 years is time-barred relieving TATA...
![Relief for TATA Steel: CESTAT Declares Excise Demand Notice Issued After 9.5 Years as Time-Barred, Exceeding 5 Years Limit- [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief for TATA Steel: CESTAT Declares Excise Demand Notice Issued After 9.5 Years as Time-Barred, Exceeding 5 Years Limit- [Read Order]")