Franklin Joshva
![AOs Application of Rule 8D Valid for Exempt Dividend Income: ITAT Upholds ₹15 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2059043-rule-8d-valid-exempt-dividend-income-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "AOs Application of Rule 8D Valid for Exempt Dividend Income: ITAT Upholds ₹15 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]")
AO's Application of Rule 8D Valid for Exempt Dividend Income: ITAT Upholds ₹15 Lakh Disallowance [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance of Rs. 15,00,327 made by the Assessing Officer (AO)...
![Relief to TVS: Madras HC Quashes Income Tax Notices Issued by JAO, Upholds Mandatory Notice By FAO under Faceless Assessment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/03/250x150_2058603-tvs-mandatory-notice-income-tax-notices-taxscan.webp "Relief to TVS: Madras HC Quashes Income Tax Notices Issued by JAO, Upholds Mandatory Notice By FAO under Faceless Assessment [Read Order]")
![Tax Rebate u/s 87A Denied Due to Omission in Original Return: ITAT Allows Rebate Claimed through Revised Return [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/03/250x150_2058410-tax-rebate.webp "Tax Rebate u/s 87A Denied Due to Omission in Original Return: ITAT Allows Rebate Claimed through Revised Return [Read Order]")
![Telescoping of Unaccounted Payments against Unaccounted Receipts is valid when they are Business-Related: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/02/250x150_2057957-unaccounted-receipt.webp "Telescoping of Unaccounted Payments against Unaccounted Receipts is valid when they are Business-Related: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Only Profit Embedded in Unaccounted Receipts can be Taxed, Not the Entire Receipts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/02/250x150_2057888-unaccounted-receipts.webp "Only Profit Embedded in Unaccounted Receipts can be Taxed, Not the Entire Receipts: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [ CIT(A) ] order that allowed deductions of Rs. 2.93 crore in interest expenses and Rs. ...
![ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056951-business-purpose-itat-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds ₹2.93 Cr Interest and ₹4.01 Cr Management Expenses Deduction Citing Business Purpose u/s 36(1)(iii) and 37(1) [Read Order]")
NRI’s Property Investment Explained with Bank Statements and Agreements: ITAT Quashes Addition Due to Jurisdictional Error
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has set aside an assessment order adding Rs. 69.99 lakh as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the...
Source of Fund of Joint Purchase of Property by Mother and Son Sufficiently Explained: ITAT Deletes ₹1.36 Cr Addition [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted an addition of Rs. 1.36 crore made by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) as unexplained investment under Section 69 of the Income Tax...
![Source of Fund of Joint Purchase of Property by Mother and Son Sufficiently Explained: ITAT Deletes ₹1.36 Cr Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056965-joint-purchase-of-property.webp "Source of Fund of Joint Purchase of Property by Mother and Son Sufficiently Explained: ITAT Deletes ₹1.36 Cr Addition [Read Order]")
Invalid Service of Notice as Opted No For Email in Form-35: ITAT Overturns Ex Parte Dismissal, Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) overturned an ex-parte dismissal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [ CIT(A) ] citing invalid service of notices, as the...
![Invalid Service of Notice as Opted No For Email in Form-35: ITAT Overturns Ex Parte Dismissal, Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056949-form-35-notice.webp "Invalid Service of Notice as Opted No For Email in Form-35: ITAT Overturns Ex Parte Dismissal, Remands Matter [Read Order]")
Loss on Abandoned Real Estate Project Allowable as Revenue Deduction: ITAT Overturns ₹64.72 Cr Disallowance [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that the loss of Rs. 64,72,52,645/- on abandoned Amritsar real estate project is an allowable revenue deduction under the Income...
![Loss on Abandoned Real Estate Project Allowable as Revenue Deduction: ITAT Overturns ₹64.72 Cr Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056923-real-estate-project-taxscan.webp "Loss on Abandoned Real Estate Project Allowable as Revenue Deduction: ITAT Overturns ₹64.72 Cr Disallowance [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Unable to Sign Appeal Does Not Constitute Reasonable Cause : ITAT Refuses to Condone 1,233 Days Delay [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) refused to condone the delay, and held that the unavailability of the taxpayer to sign appeal documents due to absence from station was...
![Taxpayer Unable to Sign Appeal Does Not Constitute Reasonable Cause : ITAT Refuses to Condone 1,233 Days Delay [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/30/500x300_2056893-condoned-itat-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-assessee-limitation-appeal-filing-taxcsan.webp "Taxpayer Unable to Sign Appeal Does Not Constitute Reasonable Cause : ITAT Refuses to Condone 1,233 Days Delay [Read Order]")
