- Home
- »
- Ipsita Das

Ipsita Das
![No Income Tax Deduction Allowable for Commission Payments Without Examination/Verification of Agreement between Payer and Dealers: ITAT [Read Order] No Income Tax Deduction Allowable for Commission Payments Without Examination/Verification of Agreement between Payer and Dealers: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Income-Tax-Deduction-Income-Tax-Deduction-Commission-Payments-Commission-Examination-Verification-Agreement-between-Payer-and-Dealers-Payer-and-Dealers-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg)
No Income Tax Deduction Allowable for Commission Payments Without Examination/Verification of Agreement between Payer and Dealers: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Assessment Order allowing deduction of commission payments has been passed...
Assessment Order for Addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A of Income Tax Act not followed by mandate DIN is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that assessment order for addition under Section 69A of Income Tax Act,1961 as unexplained income, not followed by mandate document...
No Disallowance of Business Expenses for Service Charges Collected from Tenant under the Head "Income from Business":ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT),held that the service charges collected from the tenant were accepted as assessable under the head “income from business”, therefore, the...
ITAT Restores Appeal on Condition to Furnish Required Set of Documents to Avail Tax Exemption for Trust u/s 12 AB of Income Tax [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restores the case to Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [CIT (E)] and held that tax exemption under Section 12 AB of Income Tax Act,...
Principal Amount Received Mistakenly and Not as an Advance to be Allowed as an Expenditure u/s 37 of Income Tax act along with the Interest: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that Authorities have failed to appreciate that the amount was in fact not an advance but was received mistakenly and which under a Court...
TDS Deduction u/s 194 J of Income Tax Act if Payment of Professional Services does not Exceed ₹30,000 for Relevant FY: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that deduction of tax at source has to be made by the assessee for the payment of professional services for payment exceeding...
Disallowance of Expenditure is not Mistake Apparent on Record, Outside Purview of Section 154 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that the expenditure in relation to increase in authorized share capital is of capital expenditure or revenue expenditure is out of the...
No Income Tax Deduction on Delayed Payment of Employees Contribution to PF & ESIC After Prescribed Due Date: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that delayed payment of Employees Contribution to PF (Provident Fund) and ESIC (Employees' State Insurance Corporation) after the...