Ipsita Das
![Mere Assumption that Withdrawn Amount Spent for Other Purposes Without any Adverse Positive Material cannot be the Reason for Disputing Source of Cash Deposits: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/j.jpg "Mere Assumption that Withdrawn Amount Spent for Other Purposes Without any Adverse Positive Material cannot be the Reason for Disputing Source of Cash Deposits: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Assumption that Withdrawn Amount Spent for Other Purposes Without any Adverse Positive Material cannot be the Reason for Disputing Source of Cash Deposits: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that The Assessing Officer (AO) has ignored main cash book while disputing the source of...
![Fringe Benefits Tax is Allowable as Deduction in Computing Book Profit as per Section 115JB of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Fringe-Benefits-Tax-Allowable-Deduction-Computing-Book-Profit-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Fringe Benefits Tax is Allowable as Deduction in Computing Book Profit as per Section 115JB of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Rejection of Books of Account by AO on Grounds of Defect and Discrepancies: ITAT Upholds the Decision of CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Rejection-Books-of-Account-Rejection-of-Books-of-Account-Rejection-of-Books-of-Account-by-AO-AO-CITA-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of Books of Account by AO on Grounds of Defect and Discrepancies: ITAT Upholds the Decision of CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![Date of Dispatch of Assessment order Beyond the Limitation Period Prescribed u/s 153(1) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Date-of-Dispatch-of-Assessment-order-Beyond-the-Limitation-Period-Prescribed-Income-Tax-Ac-ITAT-Quashes-Assessment-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Date of Dispatch of Assessment order Beyond the Limitation Period Prescribed u/s 153(1) of Income Tax Act: ITAT Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
No Income Tax Addition can be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act if AO Assessed the Agricultural Income Excluding Leased Land, and not in Accordance with Previous AY: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that no income tax addition can be made under section 68 of Income Tax Act if Assessing Officer (AO) excluded leased land while assessing...
![No Income Tax Addition can be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act if AO Assessed the Agricultural Income Excluding Leased Land, and not in Accordance with Previous AY: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Act-AO-Assessed-Agricultural-Income-Land-Accordance-AY-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Income Tax Addition can be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act if AO Assessed the Agricultural Income Excluding Leased Land, and not in Accordance with Previous AY: ITAT [Read Order]")
If Sales are not Disputed then Cash Deposited out of Sales cannot be Treated as Unexplained Income u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that the cash deposited out of sales cannot be treated as unexplained income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act once the sales are...
![If Sales are not Disputed then Cash Deposited out of Sales cannot be Treated as Unexplained Income u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Sales-Disputed-If-Sales-are-not-Disputed-then-Cash-Deposited-out-of-Sales-cannot-be-Treated-as-Unexplained-Income-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "If Sales are not Disputed then Cash Deposited out of Sales cannot be Treated as Unexplained Income u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Income Tax Addition can be made if Assessee Successfully Demonstrated Source of Cash Deposits in Bank Account during Demonitization Period: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that the assessee has successfully demonstrated source of cash deposit to its bank account during demonetization period thus no income...
![No Income Tax Addition can be made if Assessee Successfully Demonstrated Source of Cash Deposits in Bank Account during Demonitization Period: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Income-Tax-Addition-Assessee-Demonstrated-Source-of-Cash-Deposits-Cash-Deposits-Demonstrated-Source-Bank-Account-Demonitization-Period-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No Income Tax Addition can be made if Assessee Successfully Demonstrated Source of Cash Deposits in Bank Account during Demonitization Period: ITAT [Read Order]")
Deletion of Income Tax Addition on successful Demonstration of Source of Cash Deposits to bank during Demonitization: ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assessee has successfully demonstrated source of cash deposit of Rs. 2,40,00,000 to its bank account during demonetization period...
![Deletion of Income Tax Addition on successful Demonstration of Source of Cash Deposits to bank during Demonitization: ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Deletion-of-Income-Tax-Addition-on-successful-Demonstration-of-Source-of-Cash-Deposits-to-bank-during-Demonitization-ITAT-dismisses-Revenue-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deletion of Income Tax Addition on successful Demonstration of Source of Cash Deposits to bank during Demonitization: ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]")
Mere Delivery Contract provided for Delivery of Securities to the Broker is not Sufficient to Claim Loss in Stock Exchange: ITAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that mere fact that the delivery contract provides for delivery of the securities to the broker is not sufficient and does not meet the...
![Mere Delivery Contract provided for Delivery of Securities to the Broker is not Sufficient to Claim Loss in Stock Exchange: ITAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Mere-Delivery-Contract-Delivery-Contract-Mere-Delivery-Contract-provided-for-Delivery-of-Securities-Securities-Claim-Claim-Loss-in-Stock-Exchange-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Delivery Contract provided for Delivery of Securities to the Broker is not Sufficient to Claim Loss in Stock Exchange: ITAT Allows Appeal [Read Order]")
Gain/Loss arising out of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation is Recognised as Profit or Loss Accrued During Relevant Previous Year: ITAT reinstates Income Tax Addition [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the gain arising on account of revaluation of the outstanding forward contract as on the last of the previous year as per the...
![Gain/Loss arising out of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation is Recognised as Profit or Loss Accrued During Relevant Previous Year: ITAT reinstates Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Gain-Loss-arising-out-of-Foreign-Exchange-Fluctuation-Profit-or-Loss-Accrued-Foreign-Exchange-Fluctuation-ITAT-reinstates-Income-Tax-Addition-taxscan.jpg "Gain/Loss arising out of Foreign Exchange Fluctuation is Recognised as Profit or Loss Accrued During Relevant Previous Year: ITAT reinstates Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Nature and Source of Unrecorded Transactions and Nexus with Business Proved: ITAT Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no reasons were recorded by the PCIT (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax) for holding assessment order by AO (Assessing...
![Nature and Source of Unrecorded Transactions and Nexus with Business Proved: ITAT Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Nature-Nature-and-Source-Nature-and-Source-of-Unrecorded-Transactions-Unrecorded-Transactions-Nexus-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Nature and Source of Unrecorded Transactions and Nexus with Business Proved: ITAT Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]")