Kalyani B. Nair
Kalyani is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA, LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Criminal Law, Criminology and Penology. She always believes that Fear kills more dreams, than failure ever will. Her area of interest are Criminal law and Constitutional Law. She is also into baking, reading and gardening.
![Longer Period of Limitation not Available when Entire Information on Service Tax Liability is in Knowledge of Revenue: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Longer-Period-of-Limitation-Limitation-Entire-Information-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Longer Period of Limitation not Available when Entire Information on Service Tax Liability is in Knowledge of Revenue: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Longer Period of Limitation not Available when Entire Information on Service Tax Liability is in Knowledge of Revenue: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that the longer period of limitation not available...
![No Suppression of Facts as Goods were Cleared by Appropriate Invoice: CESTAT quashes Penalty on Director of Company [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/No-Suppression-Suppression-Appropriate-Invoice-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Suppression of Facts as Goods were Cleared by Appropriate Invoice: CESTAT quashes Penalty on Director of Company [Read Order]")
![Delay in Filing Appeal by 23 Days as Director was Abroad: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication to Decide on Condonation of Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Delay-in-Filing-Appeal-Delay-Appeal-Director-CESTAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing Appeal by 23 Days as Director was Abroad: CESTAT directs Re-Adjudication to Decide on Condonation of Delay [Read Order]")
![ITC not Sustainable when Supplying Dealer has not Paid to Government, despite Collection of Tax from Purchasing Dealer: Patna HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ITC-Supplying-Dealer-Paid-Government-despite-Collection-Tax-Purchasing-Dealer-Patna-HC-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "ITC not Sustainable when Supplying Dealer has not Paid to Government, despite Collection of Tax from Purchasing Dealer: Patna HC [Read Order]")
![Payment of Service Tax gives Right to Claim Cenvat Credit on Input Services: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Payment-Service-Tax-Payment-of-Service-Tax-Right-to-Claim-Claim-Cenvat-Credit-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Payment of Service Tax gives Right to Claim Cenvat Credit on Input Services: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Requirement that Claim for Refund should be Filed within 3 months of Tribunal's Order for Refund of Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that there is no requirement that claims for refund should be filed within 3 months of Tribunal's order...
![No Requirement that Claim for Refund should be Filed within 3 months of Tribunals Order for Refund of Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/No-Requirement-Claim-Refund-Tribunals-Refund-Pre-Deposit-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Requirement that Claim for Refund should be Filed within 3 months of Tribunals Order for Refund of Pre-Deposit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Entire Demand Beyond Normal Period is not Sustainable: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on Hiring of Buses to MSRTC under ‘Rent a Cab Operator Service’ [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand on hiring of the buses to Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) under ‘Rent a Cab operator...
![Entire Demand Beyond Normal Period is not Sustainable: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on Hiring of Buses to MSRTC under ‘Rent a Cab Operator Service’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Entire-Demand-Beyond-Normal-Period-is-not-Sustainable-Demand-Entire-Demand-Normal-Period-Sustainable-CESTAT-MSRTC-taxscan.jpg "Entire Demand Beyond Normal Period is not Sustainable: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on Hiring of Buses to MSRTC under ‘Rent a Cab Operator Service’ [Read Order]")
Demand of Interest and Penalty Provisions under Central Excise Rules: Madras HC directs Department to consider Representation by Steel Manufacturing Unit [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the Department to consider Representation by Steel Manufacturing Unit in the matter of the demand of interest and penalty provisions under the Central Excise Rules,...
![Demand of Interest and Penalty Provisions under Central Excise Rules: Madras HC directs Department to consider Representation by Steel Manufacturing Unit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Demand-Interest-Penalty-Provisions-Central-Excise-Madras-HC-Department-Representation-Steel-Manufacturing-Unit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Demand of Interest and Penalty Provisions under Central Excise Rules: Madras HC directs Department to consider Representation by Steel Manufacturing Unit [Read Order]")
Tribunal has no Jurisdiction to Prescribe Rate of Interest which is Prescribed by Government of India in terms of Notification issued u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to prescribe rate of interest which is prescribed by Government...
![Tribunal has no Jurisdiction to Prescribe Rate of Interest which is Prescribed by Government of India in terms of Notification issued u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Tribunal-Prescribe-Rate-of-Interest-Jurisdiction-Rate-of-Interest-Government-of-India-Notification-issued-Notification-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Tribunal has no Jurisdiction to Prescribe Rate of Interest which is Prescribed by Government of India in terms of Notification issued u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Madras HC Dismisses Writ Petition on Lifting of Attachment of Immovable Property by Sub Registrar [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition on lifting of attachment of immovable property by the Sub Registrar. The petitioner in the present matter is Rudraveni Manoharan....
![Madras HC Dismisses Writ Petition on Lifting of Attachment of Immovable Property by Sub Registrar [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Madras-High-Court-Madras-High-Court-Dismisses-Writ-Petition-Lifting-of-Attachment-of-Immovable-Property-by-Sub-Registrar-Immovable-Property-Sub-Registrar-Taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Dismisses Writ Petition on Lifting of Attachment of Immovable Property by Sub Registrar [Read Order]")
Violation of Natural Justice Principles: Allahabad HC imposes Costs of Rs 10,000 on Income Tax Authority [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court imposed costs of Rupees 10,000/- on the Income Tax Authority for violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner, M/s M.L. Chains, deals in the business of gold...
![Violation of Natural Justice Principles: Allahabad HC imposes Costs of Rs 10,000 on Income Tax Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Violation-of-Natural-Justice-Principles-Natural-Justice-Principles-Allahabad-High-Court-Income-Tax-Authority-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Violation of Natural Justice Principles: Allahabad HC imposes Costs of Rs 10,000 on Income Tax Authority [Read Order]")