Kalyani B. Nair
Kalyani is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA, LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Criminal Law, Criminology and Penology. She always believes that Fear kills more dreams, than failure ever will. Her area of interest are Criminal law and Constitutional Law. She is also into baking, reading and gardening.
![Absence of date from which period of 90 days is Reckoned: CESTAT quashes Recovery of Drawback Proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Absence-of-date-reckoned-CESTAT-Recovery-of-Drawback-proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "Absence of date from which period of 90 days is Reckoned: CESTAT quashes Recovery of Drawback Proceedings [Read Order]")
Absence of date from which period of 90 days is Reckoned: CESTAT quashes Recovery of Drawback Proceedings [Read Order]
In a recent ruling the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed recovery of drawback proceedings on the ground that there...
![Filing of Rectification Petition after 5 years from date of Assessment Order without Filing Statutory Appeal: Madras HC confirms Auction Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Rectification-Petition-Assessment-Order-Filing-Statutory-Appeal-Statutory-Appeal-Madras-High-Court-Auction-Notice-Notice-taxscan.jpg "Filing of Rectification Petition after 5 years from date of Assessment Order without Filing Statutory Appeal: Madras HC confirms Auction Notice [Read Order]")
![Undue Sympathy to Impose Adequate Penalty would Undermine Efficacy of Law: CESTAT Confirms Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Penalty-Law-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-service-tax-Service-Tax-Demand-Taxscan.jpg "Undue Sympathy to Impose Adequate Penalty would Undermine Efficacy of Law: CESTAT Confirms Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Cenvat Credit Allowable on Setting Up of Towers, Shelter and Parts under ‘Passive Infrastructure Sharing Agreement with Telecom Operators: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Cenvat-Credit-Setting-Up-of-Towers-Setting-Up-of-Shelter-Passive-Infrastructure-Sharing-Agreement-Telecom-Operators-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Cenvat Credit Allowable on Setting Up of Towers, Shelter and Parts under ‘Passive Infrastructure Sharing Agreement with Telecom Operators: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Simultaneous availment of Other options after choosing particular obligation under Rule 6 of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Simultaneous-Rule-6-CCR-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Simultaneous availment of Other options after choosing particular obligation under Rule 6 of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Bonafide belief on Non-Liability of Sub-Contractor When Main Contractor is liable to discharge full Service Tax: CESTAT notes extended Period of Limitation not attracted [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), comprising Ramesh Nair, Judicial Member and Raju, Technical Member noted that the extended period of limitation...
![Bonafide belief on Non-Liability of Sub-Contractor When Main Contractor is liable to discharge full Service Tax: CESTAT notes extended Period of Limitation not attracted [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Sub-Contractor-Sub-Contractor-Main-Contractor-Service-Tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Bonafide belief on Non-Liability of Sub-Contractor When Main Contractor is liable to discharge full Service Tax: CESTAT notes extended Period of Limitation not attracted [Read Order]")
Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) deleted penalty under the Finance Act on the ground that there was bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and...
![Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/evasion-of-Service-Tax-Bonafide-doubt-Service-Tax-liability-Service-Tax-Intentional-evasion-Intentional-evasion-of-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Bonafide doubt as to Service Tax liability and No Intentional evasion of Service Tax: CESTAT deletes Penalty under Finance Act [Read Order]")
Service Tax Credit should not be denied merely because Invoices are Computer generated, which did not have Signatures: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that service tax credit should not be denied merely because invoices are computer generated,...
![Service Tax Credit should not be denied merely because Invoices are Computer generated, which did not have Signatures: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Service-Tax-Credit-Service-Tax-Invoices-CESTAT-Computer-generated-invoices-Signatures-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Credit should not be denied merely because Invoices are Computer generated, which did not have Signatures: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Plea of Ambiguity in Interpretation of provision on receipt of orders from Department relating to Erroneous Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench observed that no plea of ambiguity can be made while interpretation of provision on receipt of orders from Department...
![No Plea of Ambiguity in Interpretation of provision on receipt of orders from Department relating to Erroneous Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Ambiguity-Interpretation-receipt-Department-Credit-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Plea of Ambiguity in Interpretation of provision on receipt of orders from Department relating to Erroneous Credit: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Option filed under Rule 6(3)(ii) of CCR, 2004 is effective only prospectively: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CCR-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Option filed under Rule 6(3)(ii) of CCR, 2004 is effective only prospectively: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed notice on the ground that allegation based on mere suspicion “violates natural justice and manifestation...
![Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Natural-Justice-and-Manifestation-Of-Arbitrariness-CESTAT-Notice-taxscan.jpg "Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]")
Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), noted that there is no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules and observed that rules framed by the Board are statutory in nature. ...
![Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Rule-Nature-ITAT-violation-Rule-Income-Tax-Rules-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]")