- Home
- »
- Kalyani B. Nair

Kalyani B. Nair
Kalyani is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA, LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Criminal Law, Criminology and Penology. She always believes that Fear kills more dreams, than failure ever will. Her area of interest are Criminal law and Constitutional Law. She is also into baking, reading and gardening.
![Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order] Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Non-Application-Bombay-High-Court-Reassessment-notice-Reassessment-Taxscan.jpg)
Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment notice on the ground of failure to satisfy conditions under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961...
Polypropylene Leno Bags made from Plastic Granules cannot be treated as Textile Articles: Calcutta HC Upholds AAAR Order [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court upheld the order of the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) Order and held that Polypropylene (PP) Leno Bags made from Plastic Granules cannot be treated as Textile...
“Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]
Quashing a re-assessment notice the Bombay High Court observed that “Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities only increases Burden of Courts”. The petitioner in the writ petition is Deepak Marda....
No Personal Hearing granted u/s 75 (4) of GST Act: Madras HC quashes Order on Gross Violation of Natural Justice Principles [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed order on gross violation of natural justice principles as no personal hearing granted under Section 75 (4) of Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act. The Writ Petition has...
Import of restricted Goods in violation of ITC(HS) Import Policy and Non-Declaration of Correct Value: CESTAT confirms Penalty [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), confirmed penalty on the ground that there was import of restricted goods in violation of ITC(HS) Import Policy...
CESTAT allows Interest u/s 27(A) of Customs Act at applicable Rate upon Expiry of three months from date of Receipt of Refund application till date on which Refund actually Paid
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench allowed interest under Section 27(A) of the Customs Act at applicable rate upon expiry of three months from date of...
Tax Effect below Monetary Limit prescribed by CBDT and absence of Audit Objection: Jharkhand HC dismisses Appeal holding not Maintainable [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed appeal filed by the Revenue holding not maintainable on the ground that the tax effect below monetary limit prescribed by Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and...


![Bombay HC orders re consideration on classification of ACP under CETA [Read Order] Bombay HC orders re consideration on classification of ACP under CETA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-ACP-CETA-Central-Excise-Tariff-Act-Excise-Tariff-taxscan-.jpg)
![Mere Appearance of staff of person in Judicial Custody should not be taken as appearance by Assessee himself in absence of Valid Notice: Orissa HC [Read Order] Mere Appearance of staff of person in Judicial Custody should not be taken as appearance by Assessee himself in absence of Valid Notice: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appearance-of-staff-Judicial-Custody-Assessee-Notice-Orissa-High-Court-Orissa-HC-taxscan.jpg)
![Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice citing jurisdictional errors by AO [Read Order] Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice citing jurisdictional errors by AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Notice-Re-Assessment-Notice-jurisdictional-errors-taxscan.jpg)


![“Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order] “Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Ignorance-of-Law-Authorities-Courts-Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg)
![No Personal Hearing granted u/s 75 (4) of GST Act: Madras HC quashes Order on Gross Violation of Natural Justice Principles [Read Order] No Personal Hearing granted u/s 75 (4) of GST Act: Madras HC quashes Order on Gross Violation of Natural Justice Principles [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Personal-Hearing-GST-Act-GST-Madras-High-Court-Violation-of-Natural-Justice-Principles-Violation-of-Natural-Justice-taxscan.jpg)
![Import of restricted Goods in violation of ITC(HS) Import Policy and Non-Declaration of Correct Value: CESTAT confirms Penalty [Read Order] Import of restricted Goods in violation of ITC(HS) Import Policy and Non-Declaration of Correct Value: CESTAT confirms Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Import-of-restricted-Goods-ITC-CESTAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg)


![CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act on absence of Independent Corroborative Evidence [Read Order] CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act on absence of Independent Corroborative Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CESTAT-Penalty-Customs-Act-Independent-Corroborative-Evidence-Corroborative-Evidence-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg)