- Home
- »
- Kalyani B. Nair

Kalyani B. Nair
Kalyani is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA, LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Criminal Law, Criminology and Penology. She always believes that Fear kills more dreams, than failure ever will. Her area of interest are Criminal law and Constitutional Law. She is also into baking, reading and gardening.
![Relief to BSNL: CESTAT rules Cenvat Credit cannot be Denied for Procedural Inadequacies [Read Order] Relief to BSNL: CESTAT rules Cenvat Credit cannot be Denied for Procedural Inadequacies [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/BSNL-CESTAT-rules-Cenvat-Credit-Denied-Procedural-Inadequacies-TAXSCAN.jpg)
Relief to BSNL: CESTAT rules Cenvat Credit cannot be Denied for Procedural Inadequacies [Read Order]
In a major relief to BSNL, the Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Cenvat Credit cannot be...
CESTAT rejects Refund of Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess Paid along with Excise Duty [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) rejected the refund of education cess and secondary and higher education cess” paid along with excise duty. ...
Total Cenvat Credit means Credit of Common Input Service and not of Input Service Exclusively used for Manufacture of Dutiable Product to Calculate Cenvat Credit Reversal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that the total cenvat credit means credit of common input service and not of input service exclusively...
Huy Glass made of 100% Glass Fibres, classifiable as Air Purifiers and Others under CTH: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Huy glass made of 100% glass fibres, classifiable as air purifiers and others under the customs...
Ingredients for Invocation of Extended Period not Alleged: CESTAT upholds Non-Imposition of Penalty u/s 11A of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the non-imposition of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as there was no...
No Actual Service of Notice of Hearing by Commissioner ( Appeals ): CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) quashed service tax demand as there was no actual service of notice of hearing by Commissioner ( Appeals ). ...