Kavi Priya
Content writer at Taxscan with a passion for clear, engaging legal content. I simplify tax and law topics while sharpening my research and communication skills.
![Extended Period Not Invocable when Department Previously Audited and Issued SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064438-scn-cestat-department-taxscan.webp "Extended Period Not Invocable when Department Previously Audited and Issued SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Extended Period Not Invocable when Department Previously Audited and Issued SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the extended period of limitation could not be...
![SCN Issued 3.5 Years After Voluntary Disclosure Without New Findings or Suppression: CESTAT quashes Extended Period Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064427-extended-period-demand-scn-cestat-taxscan.webp "SCN Issued 3.5 Years After Voluntary Disclosure Without New Findings or Suppression: CESTAT quashes Extended Period Demand [Read Order]")
![Form DRC-03 Not Valid for Excise Pre-Deposit, Must Use CBIC Challan via ICEGATE or Authorized Bank: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064423-form-drc-03-form-drc-03-not-valid-for-excise-pre-deposit-excise-pre-deposit-taxscan.webp "Form DRC-03 Not Valid for Excise Pre-Deposit, Must Use CBIC Challan via ICEGATE or Authorized Bank: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand Cannot Be Based Solely on Form 26AS w/o Reconciliation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064418-cestat-allahabad-reconciliation-form-26as-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand Cannot Be Based Solely on Form 26AS w/o Reconciliation: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Repeated Non-Appearance by Counsel in Bail Hearings Amounts to Professional Misconduct: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064362-counsel-bail-hearings-professional-misconduct-taxscan.webp "Repeated Non-Appearance by Counsel in Bail Hearings Amounts to Professional Misconduct: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Audit Objections Can Qualify as "Information" u/s 148A Only If AO Violated Statutory Provisions in Original Assessment: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Madras High Court held that audit objections can be treated as “information” under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act only if they clearly point out that the assessing...
![Audit Objections Can Qualify as Information u/s 148A Only If AO Violated Statutory Provisions in Original Assessment: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064259-audit-objection-reassessment-taxscan.webp "Audit Objections Can Qualify as Information u/s 148A Only If AO Violated Statutory Provisions in Original Assessment: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Receipts Not Qualify as FTS if No Technology Transfer: Delhi HC Rules Income Not Taxable Under India-UK DTAA [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court held that payments received by a UK-based company from an Indian entity are not taxable in India under the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement...
![Receipts Not Qualify as FTS if No Technology Transfer: Delhi HC Rules Income Not Taxable Under India-UK DTAA [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064212-payment-for-administrative-support-services-administrative-support-administrative-support-services-technical-services-india-uk-dtaa-itat-taxscan-1.webp "Receipts Not Qualify as FTS if No Technology Transfer: Delhi HC Rules Income Not Taxable Under India-UK DTAA [Read Order]")
![Customs cannot cancel or question MEIS Licenses Without Prior Action by DGFT: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/500x300_2063940-intimation-intimation-contain-adjustment-nor-demand-reduction-nor-reduction-refund-regarding-exclusion-meis-licence-denovo-adjudication-income-income-tax-merchandise-taxscan.webp "Customs cannot cancel or question MEIS Licenses Without Prior Action by DGFT: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief for Castrol India: CESTAT Rules SAD Refund Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Brand Name Change When Product Is Identical [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Special Additional Duty (SAD) refund under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus cannot be denied merely...
![Relief for Castrol India: CESTAT Rules SAD Refund Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Brand Name Change When Product Is Identical [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/500x300_2063894-whatsapp-image-2025-04-14-at-10608-pm.webp "Relief for Castrol India: CESTAT Rules SAD Refund Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Brand Name Change When Product Is Identical [Read Order]")
