Kavi Priya
Content writer at Taxscan with a passion for clear, engaging legal content. I simplify tax and law topics while sharpening my research and communication skills.
![GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043591-gst-notices-common-portal-taxscan-1.webp "GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]")
GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order after finding that the notice was not served at the correct address of ...
![17-Year Delay in Adjudication: Madras HC Quashes Service Tax SCN Despite Department’s Call Book Justification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/250x150_2043579-service-tax-notice-pay-recovery-notice-recovery-cestat-demand-cbic-cbic-circular-gst-taxscan.webp "17-Year Delay in Adjudication: Madras HC Quashes Service Tax SCN Despite Department’s Call Book Justification [Read Order]")
![ITAT Favors Micromax in ₹16 Cr FD Interest and Section 14A Dispute; Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/250x150_2043240-itat-revision-order-fd-interest-taxscan.webp "ITAT Favors Micromax in ₹16 Cr FD Interest and Section 14A Dispute; Quashes Revision Order [Read Order]")
Customer Contracts and Assembled Workforce are “Intangible Assets”: ITAT Allows Genpact’s Depreciation Claim on Acquisition of Debt Collection Firm Acquisition in 2010 [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed Genpact Services LLC's claim for depreciation on customer contracts and assembled workforce, holding that these qualify as...
![Customer Contracts and Assembled Workforce are “Intangible Assets”: ITAT Allows Genpact’s Depreciation Claim on Acquisition of Debt Collection Firm Acquisition in 2010 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/500x300_2043224-itat-delhi-intangible-assets-taxscan.webp "Customer Contracts and Assembled Workforce are “Intangible Assets”: ITAT Allows Genpact’s Depreciation Claim on Acquisition of Debt Collection Firm Acquisition in 2010 [Read Order]")
Madras HC Strikes Down GST Time Extensions Notification u/s 168A: What It Means for Pending Adjudications
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court struck down two GST notifications issued under Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, which extended the time limits for...
Excise Dept Fails to Probe 90 of 160 Transactions, Vendor Not Made Co-Noticee: CESTAT Upholds Cenvat Credit Claim [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Cenvat credit cannot be denied based solely on assumptions and an incomplete investigation by the...
![Excise Dept Fails to Probe 90 of 160 Transactions, Vendor Not Made Co-Noticee: CESTAT Upholds Cenvat Credit Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/10/500x300_2041997-excise-department-excise-department-fails-to-probe-90-of-160-transactions-taxscan.webp "Excise Dept Fails to Probe 90 of 160 Transactions, Vendor Not Made Co-Noticee: CESTAT Upholds Cenvat Credit Claim [Read Order]")
Co-Noticees Cannot Be Penalized Independently Once Main Noticee Settles Dispute Under SVLDRS Scheme: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that co-noticees cannot be penalized independently once the main noticee settles the dispute under the...
![Co-Noticees Cannot Be Penalized Independently Once Main Noticee Settles Dispute Under SVLDRS Scheme: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/10/500x300_2042002-svldrs-scheme-site-img.webp "Co-Noticees Cannot Be Penalized Independently Once Main Noticee Settles Dispute Under SVLDRS Scheme: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Commission Deducted by Foreign Buyers in Export Transactions Lacking Agent Relationship: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that service tax is not payable on commission amounts deducted by foreign buyers in export transactions...
![No Service Tax on Commission Deducted by Foreign Buyers in Export Transactions Lacking Agent Relationship: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/10/500x300_2041986-no-service-tax-5.webp "No Service Tax on Commission Deducted by Foreign Buyers in Export Transactions Lacking Agent Relationship: CESTAT [Read Order]")