Kavi Priya
Content writer at Taxscan with a passion for clear, engaging legal content. I simplify tax and law topics while sharpening my research and communication skills.
![Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087642-rajasthan-hc-income-tax-dept-refund-interest-money-demand-order-taxscan.webp "Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]")
Rajasthan HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Refund Rs. 24.06 Lakh with 12% Interest for Withholding Money without Demand Order [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court ruled that the Income Tax Department could not retain money collected during a search without passing a valid demand order,...
![CENVAT Credit Admissible Once Service Tax is Paid and Supported by Valid Invoice, Irrespective of Whether Paid by Provider or Recipient: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/250x150_2087571-cenvat-credit-cestat-taxscan.webp "CENVAT Credit Admissible Once Service Tax is Paid and Supported by Valid Invoice, Irrespective of Whether Paid by Provider or Recipient: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Remuneration Paid to Directors is in Nature of Salary, Excluded from Service Definition: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/250x150_2087574-remuneration-nature-of-salary-service-definition-cestat-taxscan.webp "Remuneration Paid to Directors is in Nature of Salary, Excluded from Service Definition: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![ITC cannot Be Denied Merely Because Supplier’s Suppliers Defaulted: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087518-delhi-high-court-gst-itc-input-tax-credit-taxscan-1.webp "ITC cannot Be Denied Merely Because Supplier’s Suppliers Defaulted: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Income Tax Dept can Conduct Surprise Searches on Family’s Lockers over Suspicion of Undisclosed Assets: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Department can conduct surprise searches on family lockers under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if there are valid reasons...
![Income Tax Dept can Conduct Surprise Searches on Family’s Lockers over Suspicion of Undisclosed Assets: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087478-2041942-locker-rentals.webp "Income Tax Dept can Conduct Surprise Searches on Family’s Lockers over Suspicion of Undisclosed Assets: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![CBIC Issues Clarification on GST Treatment of Secondary & Post-Sale Discounts [Read Circular]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/13/500x300_2086373-cbic-issues-clarification-on-gst-treatment-taxscan.webp "CBIC Issues Clarification on GST Treatment of Secondary & Post-Sale Discounts [Read Circular]")
Supreme Court to Decide on Whether Wipro Can Claim Excise Exemption for New Products Made in Existing Unit Post Cut-Off Date, Lists matter on 15th Sep 2025
In a pending appeal, the Supreme Court of India is set to examine a challenge filed by the Commissioner of CGST against Wipro Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., questioning the company’s entitlement to ...
Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal held that Procter & Gamble is not liable to pay 18% interest on the profiteered amount since the profiteering...
![Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085966-gstat-procter-gamble-not-liable-taxscan.webp "Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]")
Relief for Pidilite: Madhya Pradesh HC Classifies Steel Grip Insulating Tape as ‘Insulator’, Taxable at 5% [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that Steel Grip Insulating Tape manufactured by Pidilite Industries Ltd. is to be classified as an “insulator” under Entry 50, Part II,...
![Relief for Pidilite: Madhya Pradesh HC Classifies Steel Grip Insulating Tape as ‘Insulator’, Taxable at 5% [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085860-pidilite-relief-for-pidilite-madhya-pradesh-high-court-taxscan.webp "Relief for Pidilite: Madhya Pradesh HC Classifies Steel Grip Insulating Tape as ‘Insulator’, Taxable at 5% [Read Order]")
