Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Namaskar Acharya
![AO Fails to Follow Procedures in Issuing Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Procedures-Issuing-Notice-Income-Tax-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO Fails to Follow Procedures in Issuing Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Follow Procedures in Issuing Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition of Rs. 37,35,000/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under...
![Capital Gain Tax paid by Wife need not be taxed again for Husband: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Capital-Gain-tax-paid-wife-taxed-husband-ITAT-deletes-addition-TAXSCAN.jpg "Capital Gain Tax paid by Wife need not be taxed again for Husband: ITAT deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
![Inadvertent Error in statement during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty u/s 272(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Penalty against Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Inadvertent-Error-in-statement-during-Hearing-cannot-be-Reason-for-Levy-of-penalty-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-quashes-Penalty-against-Kotak-Mahindra-Bank-TAXSCAN.jpg "Inadvertent Error in statement during Hearing cannot be Reason for Levy of penalty u/s 272(1)(c) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Penalty against Kotak Mahindra Bank [Read Order]")
![Notices of Hearing not received on Grounds of Technical Glitches in ITBA Portal : ITAT Directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Notices-Hearing-received-Grounds-Technical-Glitches-ITBA-Portal-ITAT-Fresh-Adjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Notices of Hearing not received on Grounds of Technical Glitches in ITBA Portal : ITAT Directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![AO Fails to Verify Additional Evidence in violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Fails-to-Verify-Additional-Evidence-Income-Tax-Rules-Additional-Evidence-ITAT-directs-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Verify Additional Evidence in violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
Failure to Show Explanation on Cash Deposits Being Unaware of Notice Uploaded in e-Filing Portal on Counsel's e-mail ID: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed readjudication on the grounds of unawareness of notice uploaded in e-filing portal on Counsel’s e-mail ID and failure to show...
![Failure to Show Explanation on Cash Deposits Being Unaware of Notice Uploaded in e-Filing Portal on Counsels e-mail ID: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Cash-Deposits-e-Filing-Portal-on-Counsels-e-mail-ID-ITAT-Directs-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Show Explanation on Cash Deposits Being Unaware of Notice Uploaded in e-Filing Portal on Counsels e-mail ID: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
![AO fails to Communicate reason to Hold Income Under-reported: ITAT quashes 200% Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Communicate-Hold-Income-reported-ITAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO fails to Communicate reason to Hold Income Under-reported: ITAT quashes 200% Penalty [Read Order]")