Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![CPC cannot continue to Rectify and Re-rectify intimation u/s 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act Repeatedly: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CPC-CPC-cannot-continue-to-Rectify-Rectify-and-Re-rectify-intimation-taxscan.jpg "CPC cannot continue to Rectify and Re-rectify intimation u/s 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act Repeatedly: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
CPC cannot continue to Rectify and Re-rectify intimation u/s 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act Repeatedly: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the Central Processing Centre ( CPC ) of the Income Tax Department cannot repeatedly rectify and re-rectify...
![Mere Change in Route Not Enough to Invoke GST Sec.129: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Calcutta-High-Court-Route-Not-Enough-to-Invoke-GST-taxscan.jpg "Mere Change in Route Not Enough to Invoke GST Sec.129: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
![Losses of Previous AY not to be Included while Computing Tax Effect Under CBDT Circular: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/tax-effect-CBDT.jpg "Losses of Previous AY not to be Included while Computing Tax Effect Under CBDT Circular: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Confirms Penalty on Non-Filing of GST Returns and Payment [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Supreme-Court-Confirms-Penalty-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court Confirms Penalty on Non-Filing of GST Returns and Payment [Read Judgement]")
![CIT(E) Rejects Trust’s Registration Regularisation Filed Under Incorrect Provision due to Portal Issue Without SCN: ITAT remands Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Assessments-Tax-Exemption-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(E) Rejects Trust’s Registration Regularisation Filed Under Incorrect Provision due to Portal Issue Without SCN: ITAT remands Case [Read Order]")
STO’s Power to Initiate GST Sec. 129 Proceedings for Alleged Violation of Rule 86B Challenged: Allahabad HC Seeks Clarity from Dept [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has sought a detailed clarification from the State GST Department in a case where initiation of penalty proceedings under the Section 129 of Goods and Services Tax ( GST )...
![STO’s Power to Initiate GST Sec. 129 Proceedings for Alleged Violation of Rule 86B Challenged: Allahabad HC Seeks Clarity from Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/STOs-Power-GST-GST-Section-129-Alleged-Violation-taxscan.jpg "STO’s Power to Initiate GST Sec. 129 Proceedings for Alleged Violation of Rule 86B Challenged: Allahabad HC Seeks Clarity from Dept [Read Order]")
Error in One or Two Digit in GST Invoice or E-Way Bill Not Ground for Sec. 129 Proceedings: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that minor clerical errors such as a one or two-digit mismatch in the GST invoice or on the GST e-way bill cannot be the basis for initiating proceedings under...
![Error in One or Two Digit in GST Invoice or E-Way Bill Not Ground for Sec. 129 Proceedings: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Allahabad-High-Court-E-Way-Bill-Sec.-129-Proceedings-taxscan.jpg "Error in One or Two Digit in GST Invoice or E-Way Bill Not Ground for Sec. 129 Proceedings: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
CA and Trader Faces GST SCN for Alleged Ties with Fake Firms: Delhi HC Refuses Stay Adjudication [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Delhi High Court declined to interfere in ongoing adjudication proceedings initiated by the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) Department against a Chartered Accountant and...
![CA and Trader Faces GST SCN for Alleged Ties with Fake Firms: Delhi HC Refuses Stay Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GST-SC-1.jpg "CA and Trader Faces GST SCN for Alleged Ties with Fake Firms: Delhi HC Refuses Stay Adjudication [Read Order]")
Revenue's Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the income tax department on the ground that the tax effect involved was below the prescribed monetary threshold of ₹2 crore, and no exceptional...
![Revenues Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-High-Court-Revenues-Claim-Exceptional-Case-Rejected-taxscan.jpg "Revenues Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]")
Casio's Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]
In an important order, the Delhi High Court has pulled up the Income Tax Department for an inordinate delay of over 12 years in disposing of Casio India’s income tax appeal, even as the department...
![Casios Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/casio-site-img.jpg "Casios Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]")
