Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![No Income Tax Addition Permissible in Unabated Assessment Without Incriminating Material Found During Search u/s 132: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/income-tax-Addition-site-img.jpg "No Income Tax Addition Permissible in Unabated Assessment Without Incriminating Material Found During Search u/s 132: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Income Tax Addition Permissible in Unabated Assessment Without Incriminating Material Found During Search u/s 132: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has ruled that no addition can be made under Section 153A in an unabated assessment...
![5 Hearings Missed including one During Covid Period: ITAT Grants Another Chance, Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Personal-Hearing-mandatory-Rectification-Application-decision-filer-Adversely-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpg "5 Hearings Missed including one During Covid Period: ITAT Grants Another Chance, Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Incriminating-Material-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
![GST Demand Order Passed alleging Excess ITC Claim: Madras HC directs to Consider Application for Rectification of Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/gst-demand-site-img.jpg "GST Demand Order Passed alleging Excess ITC Claim: Madras HC directs to Consider Application for Rectification of Order [Read Order]")
Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹4,00,000 on BI Minning (India) Private Limited and its directors in default for failing to disclose particulars of related...
![Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-site-img-1.jpg "Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
Failure to Affix CIN in Company's Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]
In a recent adjudication order, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹6,000 on Private Limited company and its two directors for violating Section 12(3)(c) of the...
![Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-MGT-3-CA-CS-CMA-taxscan.jpg-1.webp "Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]")
AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) , Mumbai Bench, has held that an addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained solely on the basis of a WhatsApp image found on...
![AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Section-69A-income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.webp "AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]")
Prima Facie Adjustment of ESI/PF Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) Not Permissible during Pendency of Debatable Checkmate Case before SC: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]
In an important ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court has held that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) cannot disallow ESI/PF contemplated under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 during the...
![Prima Facie Adjustment of ESI/PF Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) Not Permissible during Pendency of Debatable Checkmate Case before SC: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Prima-Facie-Adjustment-ESIPF-Disallowance-us-1431a-Pendency-Debatable-Checkmate-SC-Chhattisgarh-HC-taxscan.jpg "Prima Facie Adjustment of ESI/PF Disallowance u/s 143(1)(a) Not Permissible during Pendency of Debatable Checkmate Case before SC: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")
