- Home
- »
- Navasree A.M

Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![AO cannot use Pending Income Tax Demand to summarily dismiss TDS Application u/s 197: Patna High Court [Read Order] AO cannot use Pending Income Tax Demand to summarily dismiss TDS Application u/s 197: Patna High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Patna-High-Court-Income-Tax-Demand-Income-Tax-TDS-TDS-Application-Section-197-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg)
AO cannot use Pending Income Tax Demand to summarily dismiss TDS Application u/s 197: Patna High Court [Read Order]
The Patna High Court has ruled that a pending income tax demand cannot be used by the Assessing Officer (AO) as the sole basis to summarily reject an...
Madras High Court quashes GST Recovery Proceedings against Deceased Person, Rules Assessment Orders and Notices Void Ab-initio [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) recovery proceedings and GST orders initiated against a deceased individual, Ramasamy Singaravelan. The court ruled that the GST...
'Powder Coating' for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that the work involving 'powder coating' of yokes, links, and tubes constitutes a works contract and is therefore liable for Value Added Tax ( VAT ). The Commercial...
Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed to issue fresh orders on matters where two Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) notices were issued by the different GST officers for the same Assessment...
41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a demand order after discovering that 41% of the disputed GST ( Goods and Services Tax) amount was recovered and issued a demand order without granting the...
GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has quashed a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment order issued prematurely by GST authorities that is 10 days expiration of the time limit for filing reply, citing a...





![GST Payer cannot be Deprived of Benefit due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal: Patna HC stays Recovery [Read Order] GST Payer cannot be Deprived of Benefit due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal: Patna HC stays Recovery [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-appellate-tribunal-issues-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Madras High Court quashes GST Recovery Proceedings against Deceased Person, Rules Assessment Orders and Notices Void Ab-initio [Read Order] Madras High Court quashes GST Recovery Proceedings against Deceased Person, Rules Assessment Orders and Notices Void Ab-initio [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Madras-High-Court-GST-Recovery-Proceedings-Assessment-Order-GST-Recovery-against-Deceased-taxscan.jpg)
![Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order] Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Value-Added-Tax-Powder-coating-tubes-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order] Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-SCN-AY-Taxscan.jpg)
![41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order] 41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Hearing-opportunity-Demand-Order-GST-Demand-Order-TAXSCAN.webp)
![GST ITC Mismatch : Madras HC allows to Substantiate defence on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order] GST ITC Mismatch : Madras HC allows to Substantiate defence on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-ITC-Pre-deposit-Pre-deposit-Taxscan.jpg)
![GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order] GST Order Prematurely passed 10 days before Expiration of Time Limit to Reply: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Order-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg)
