Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![Alternate Remedies under GST Act or Amnesty Scheme must be Utilised before Seeking Article 226 Relief: Patna HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Gst-gst-act-gst-news-Alternate-Remedies-under-GST-Act-Patna-HC-Patna-High-Court-Amnesty-Scheme-Article-226-Article-226-of-Constitution-of-India-goods-and-service-tax-act-taxscan.jpg "Alternate Remedies under GST Act or Amnesty Scheme must be Utilised before Seeking Article 226 Relief: Patna HC [Read Order]")
Alternate Remedies under GST Act or Amnesty Scheme must be Utilised before Seeking Article 226 Relief: Patna HC [Read Order]
The Patna High Court has ruled that alternate remedies available under the GST ( Goods and Services Act) or the amnesty scheme introduced by the...
![‘Law Favours diligent and not the indolent’: Patna HC refuses Entertain Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/GST-Registration-Cancellation-GST-Registration-patna-hc-about-GST-Registration-Cancellation-patna-hc-on-GST-Registration-Cancellation-gst-patna-hc-news-gst-news-taxscan.jpg "‘Law Favours diligent and not the indolent’: Patna HC refuses Entertain Petition Challenging GST Registration Cancellation [Read Order]")
![Appeal delay over Mail ID Access issue and Late Discovery of CIT(A) Order: ITAT condones 601 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/CITA-Mail-ID-CITA-Order-ITAT-601-Days-Appeal-Delay-ITAT-condones-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Appeal delay over Mail ID Access issue and Late Discovery of CIT(A) Order: ITAT condones 601 Days [Read Order]")
Challenge to Section 153C Notice Raised Post-Assessment Order issuance must use Statutory Remedy: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court observed that the challenge to the income tax notice issued under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was raised only after the assessment order was issued, and thus...
Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that a faceless hearing under Section 144B(6)(8) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be granted if requested. This court set aside the assessment order that had...
![Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Madras-High-Court-Section-144B68-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Faceless-Hearing-taxscan.jpeg "Faceless Personal Hearing u/s 144B(6)(8) should be Granted Mandatorily if Requested: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition made after deducting withdrawals: Rajasthan HC confirms Penalty u/s 271 [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court has upheld a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, confirming that the unexplained cash deposits were correctly added by the income tax department...
NFRA Debars CA and Firm for 2 Years Over Multiple Audit Lapses, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The NFRA ( National Financial Reporting Authority ) has debarred the CA ( Chartered Accountant ) and his firm for committing multiple audit lapses for two years. It also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5...
Failure to Assemble Audit File within 60 days of Completion of Audit: NFRA Debars CA and Firm for 2 Years [Read Order]
A CA ( Chartered Accountant ) and his firm was debarred by the financial reporting authority for failure to submit the audit file within 60 days of completion of the audit. The NFRA also imposed a...
Reassessment Notice u/s 148 Challenged only after Issuance of Order instead of its Inception: Rajasthan HC declines to Entertain Petition [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court declined to exercise the jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India as the income tax reassessment notice under Section 148 was challenged only after the...
Income Tax Dept fails to Contradict Taxpayer’s Evidence for LTCG from Share Sale: Rajasthan HC Upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), observing that the income tax department failed to provide any contradictory evidence...
![Income Tax Dept fails to Contradict Taxpayer’s Evidence for LTCG from Share Sale: Rajasthan HC Upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/income-tax-LTCG-from-Share-Sale-Income-Tax-Dept-ITAT-Order-Rajasthan-HC-Upholds-ITAT-Order-income-tax-news-itat-news-rajasthan-hc-news-share-sale-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Dept fails to Contradict Taxpayer’s Evidence for LTCG from Share Sale: Rajasthan HC Upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]")