Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![Madras HC Orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration of GST Demand Arising from Wrongful ITC Claim Amid Non-Response to SCN & Personal Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-ITC-Claim-GST-tax-news-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration of GST Demand Arising from Wrongful ITC Claim Amid Non-Response to SCN & Personal Hearing [Read Order]")
Madras HC Orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration of GST Demand Arising from Wrongful ITC Claim Amid Non-Response to SCN & Personal Hearing [Read Order]
The Madras High Court mandated 10% pre-deposit of disputed tax for the reconsideration of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand arising from the...
![Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Demand-Order-Madras-HC-sets-aside-GST-Demand-Order-taxscan.jpg "Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]")
![GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Liability-Misconception-of-Intra-and-Inter-State-Sales-Madras-HC-Reconsideration-on-Pre-deposit-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
No Additions Proposed in Income Tax Assessment Order: Madras HC quashes Demand in Computation Sheet and Notice [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court quashed the demand in Computation Sheet and Notice as no additions were proposed in the income tax assessment order. The Petitioner, Organization...
![No Additions Proposed in Income Tax Assessment Order: Madras HC quashes Demand in Computation Sheet and Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Income-Tax-Assessment-Order-Madras-HC-Computation-Sheet-Notice-taxscan.jpg "No Additions Proposed in Income Tax Assessment Order: Madras HC quashes Demand in Computation Sheet and Notice [Read Order]")
GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]
The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 crores for setting aside the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which was confirmed without the consideration of GSTR 9C. Renaatus...
![GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Demand-GSTR-9C-Madras-HC-Pre-deposit-taxscan.jpg "GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]")
Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Madras High Court nullified a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) DRC-07 order issued disregarding the assessee's submitted reply. The challenge to an order dated 29.12.2023 arised from the...
![Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-GST-GST-DRC-07-Order-Reply-Submitted-Reconsideration-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) portal. AÂ Single bench of...
![Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Portal-GST-TAX-NEWS-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the refund of the recovered amount as the proper officer failed to explain the reason for recovering the amount under Section 78 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax,...
![Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-TNGST-GST-GST-Refund-Section-78-of-TNGST-taxscan.jpg "Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]")
Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently overturned a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) order, requiring a pre-deposit of 10%. The order had confirmed the tax liability based on alleged wrongful availment of...
![Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/madras-hc-madras-high-court-GST-goods-and-sevice-tax-tax-liability-TAXSCAN.jpg "Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
CBDT’s Office Memo (Instr No.1914) does not Mandate 20% Remittance of Disputed Tax for Stay Application: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that the Office Memorandum (Instruction No.1914) of the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) does not mandate 20% remittance of the disputed tax for...
