Navasree A.M
Navasree A M, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons), a lawyer with over 2.5 years of experience as a researcher and content writer at Taxscan, specializing in Indirect Taxes and Corporate Laws.
![Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Portal-GST-TAX-NEWS-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and...
![Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-TNGST-GST-GST-Refund-Section-78-of-TNGST-taxscan.jpg "Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]")
![Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/madras-hc-madras-high-court-GST-goods-and-sevice-tax-tax-liability-TAXSCAN.jpg "Tax Liability Confirmed due to Wrong availment of ITC and and failure to reply SCN: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
Unawareness of Proceedings w.r.t GST Returns Disparity due to Order Uploaded in Additional Notices and Orders tab: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit Remand
The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of 10% for contesting the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which confirmed failure to respond to the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) proceedings as...
GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court held that the documents such as GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and Income Tax records alone are insufficient to establish that Goods Transport Services fall under the Reverse Charge Mechanism...
![GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Reverse-Charge-Mechanism-Goods-Transport-Services-Madras-High-Court-GSTR-9-GSTR-9C-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Madras HC quashes GST Assessment Orders issued without considering Interim Reply Submitted by Taxpayer [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment orders issued without considering the interim reply submitted by the petitioner/taxpayer. The court directed the GST...
![Madras HC quashes GST Assessment Orders issued without considering Interim Reply Submitted by Taxpayer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-Goods-and-Services-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC quashes GST Assessment Orders issued without considering Interim Reply Submitted by Taxpayer [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Mandates 10% Pre-deposit to Contest GSTR 1 vs GSTR 3B Discrepancy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-10-Pre-deposit-Contest-GSTR-1-GSTR-3B-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Mandates 10% Pre-deposit to Contest GSTR 1 vs GSTR 3B Discrepancy [Read Order]")
Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]
The Madras High Court orders pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed demand to nullify the contested order. The court's decision came in light of the assessee's non-participation in the Goods and Services...
![Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Goods-and-service-tax-Madras-High-court-Tax-Liability-GST-Proceedings-GST-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]")
Faceless Personal Hearing is mandatory u/s 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act if Requested: Madras HC Interprets term ‘Shall’
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the faceless personal hearing is mandatory under Section 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act, 1961 if requested. The court interpreted the ‘Shall’ in...
Madras HC Overturns Rejection of GST Refund Application due to Inverted Turnover and GSTR1, 3B and 2A Discrepancy [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court overturned the rejection of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) refund application due to the Discrepancies between Inverted Turnover and GSTR 1, 3B and 2A The...
![Madras HC Overturns Rejection of GST Refund Application due to Inverted Turnover and GSTR1, 3B and 2A Discrepancy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HIGH-COURT-GOODS-AND-SERVICE-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Overturns Rejection of GST Refund Application due to Inverted Turnover and GSTR1, 3B and 2A Discrepancy [Read Order]")