- Home
- »
- Saagarika Gopinath

Saagarika Gopinath
Final year BBA LLB( Hons) law student at Government Law College
![Construction Services under Collaboration Agreements Fall under Works Contract: CESTAT quashes Rs. 1.59 Crore Service Tax Demand [Read Order] Construction Services under Collaboration Agreements Fall under Works Contract: CESTAT quashes Rs. 1.59 Crore Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Construction-Services-Construction-Services-under-Collaboration-Agreements-Works-Contract-taxscan.jpg)
Construction Services under Collaboration Agreements Fall under Works Contract: CESTAT quashes Rs. 1.59 Crore Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) quashed the Rs. 1.59 crore service tax...
Expenditure u/s 57 Justified with Established Income Nexus: ITAT allows to claim Deduction [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the assessee to claim a deduction of Rs. 30.4 lakhs under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as...
Co-operative Society Eligible for Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) on Interest Earned from Fixed Deposits in Co-operative Bank: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the assessee, which is a co-operative society, is eligible for a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on interest earned from...
ESOP expenses should not be regarded contingent or notional: ITAT allows Goldman Sachs to claim deduction u/s 37(1) [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed Goldman Sachs to claim deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 and held that ESOP expenses...
ITAT allows Goldman Sachs to claim deduction for leave encashment paid before due date of ITR filing u/s 43B(f) [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the assessee Goldman Sachs to claim deduction for leave encashment paid before the due date of ITR filing...
Additions u/s 68 & 69A made without Examining Books of Accounts: ITAT remands case for Reassessment [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the case back to the assessing officer ( AO ) as the additions under Sections 68 and 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961Â were made...