- Home
- »
- Saagarika Gopinath

Saagarika Gopinath
Final year BBA LLB( Hons) law student at Government Law College

Important Income Tax Forms Due by December 31st, 2024
By the end of this month, there are many income tax forms under the Income-tax Act, 1961, which are to be filed by December 31st, to avoid penalties....
AO’s Mistaken Presumption of Personal Expenditure instead of Personnel Expenditure: ITAT deletes Disallowance [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the disallowance made by the AO as the AO presumed the expenses claimed by the assessee as ‘personal...
Delhi HC Rejects Challenge to Assessment Order u/s 143(3), Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Frivolous Litigation [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi passed under Section 143(3) of the Act. The High Court rejected a petition challenging the assessment order passed under Section 143( 3 ) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as...
Purchases Claimed by Assessee not Proven to be Non-Business Related: Delhi HC Upholds ITAT's Findings [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court upheld the findings of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) and held that the purchases claimed by the assessee were solely and exclusively for business...
Treatment of Interest on Noida Land Acquisition Compensation under Dispute: ITAT directs AO to Consider Matter Afresh [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the income tax matter as the source of creation of fixed deposits ( FD ) needed verification of land...
‘An Audit Report is not an Order of Determination u/s 106 (1) of the Finance Act, 2013’: Delhi HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue and held that an audit report is not an order of determination under Section 106 (1) of the Finance Act, 2013. In...
'Without challenging the Excise refund order, the Refund cannot be recovered': CESTAT overturns Commissioner's decision [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the excise refund cannot be recovered when the department has not challenged...
‘No person will derive any Undue Benefit by not preferring Appeal against any Assessment order passed under Act’: ITAT condones 2564-day delay [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Lucknow bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the appeal filed by the assessee and condoned the 2564-day delay in filing the appeal, as no undue benefit...