- Home
- »
- Saagarika Gopinath

Saagarika Gopinath
Final year BBA LLB( Hons) law student at Government Law College
![CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order] CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/refund-claim-Taxscan.jpg)
CESTAT Upholds Rejection of Refund Claim as Time-Barred, Dismisses Appeal Citing Binding Limitation Under S.102 [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the rejection of a refund claim filed by the...
CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarder as it Finds No Evidence of Intended Export [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in New Delhi has set aside a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed on the assessee, Saurav Chopra, a freight forwarder,...
Non-Appointment of Woman Director u/s 149(1) of Companies Act: Recent Judicial Trends and MCA Crackdowns [Read Order]
While going through the several adjudication orders that have been passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, we can see...
Relief to Technova Imaging Systems: Bombay HC Allows Depreciation Claim Without Section 72A Approval [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court granted relief to Technova Imaging Systems and allowed the depreciation claim without the approval under Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. One of the main grounds...
'Limitation Not Applicable to Pre-Deposit Refunds': CESTAT Orders 12% Interest from Date of Deposit [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)Â held that the time limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, does not apply to refund...