- Home
- »
- Shabna Rahim

Shabna Rahim
![Manufacture of Sugar Syrup is not Marketable and Not liable to pay Duty: CESTAT quashes Demand of Duty [Read Order] Manufacture of Sugar Syrup is not Marketable and Not liable to pay Duty: CESTAT quashes Demand of Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Not-liable-to-pay-Duty-liable-pay-Duty-Manufacture-of-Sugar-Syrup-Sugar-Syrup-Marketable-CESTAT-quashes-Demand-of-Duty-CESTAT-Demand-of-Duty-taxscan.jpg)
Manufacture of Sugar Syrup is not Marketable and Not liable to pay Duty: CESTAT quashes Demand of Duty [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the demand of duty on the ground of the manufacturing of...
Madras HC Dismisses WP against Assessment Order passed u/s 73 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act on ground of Limitation [Read Order]
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed against the assessment order passed by the Assistant Commissioner under section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 on the...
Rejection of Claim of Refund Application u/s 27A of the Customs Act without Giving Sufficient opportunity to petitioner: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs for rejecting the claim of refund application filed under section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962 without giving sufficient...
Madras HC Upholds Order passed by Deputy Commissioner u/s 220(6) of Income Tax Act on ground of Non-appearance of Petitioner [Read Order]
The Madras High Court upheld the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961 on the ground of non-appearance of the petitioner. Doosan power...
Boiler Ash and Sludge which emerged as Byproducts falls outside purview of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules: CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed on Excess Recovery Demand [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed the penalty imposed on excess recovery demand on boiler ash and sludge which was categorized as products or waste...
Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the order of demand of central excise duty on the ground of the inclusion of Waste Pickle Liquid (WPL) as...
Invoice or Challan issued by Provider of Input Service is a Relevant Document for Availing CENVAT credit u/r 9 of CENVAT credit rules: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the invoices or challan issued by the provider of input services was a relevant document for availing CENVAT...
Manufacturer of Final Product is Entitled to Take Credit of Excise Duty on Capital Goods received in Factory for Production of Final Product: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the manufacturer of final products was entitled to take credit of excise duty on capital goods...


![Payment of License Fee which is not Condition of Sale cannot be included in Transaction Value u/r 10(1)(c) of Customs Valuation Rules: CESTAT [Read Order] Payment of License Fee which is not Condition of Sale cannot be included in Transaction Value u/r 10(1)(c) of Customs Valuation Rules: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Payment-of-License-Fee-License-Fee-Payment-Condition-of-Sale-Sale-Transaction-Value-Customs-Valuation-Rules-CESTAT-taxscan-.jpg)
![ITAT upholds Allowance of Deduction u/s 10AA of Income Tax Act on ground of Proper e-filing of Form 56F [Read Order] ITAT upholds Allowance of Deduction u/s 10AA of Income Tax Act on ground of Proper e-filing of Form 56F [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/deduction-claim-allow-filing-electronic-filing-form-56F-income-tax-upheld-ITAT-taxscan.jpg)
![ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition made by CIT(A) on ground of Non Consideration of Previous Decision of Assessment [Read Order] ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition made by CIT(A) on ground of Non Consideration of Previous Decision of Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Upholds-Deletion-of-Addition-made-by-CITA-on-ground-of-Non-Consideration-of-Previous-Decision-of-Assessment-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![ITAT directs to delete Addition made by AO on ground of Wrongful Assessment of Tax Liability [Read Order] ITAT directs to delete Addition made by AO on ground of Wrongful Assessment of Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Directs-Delete-Addition-AO-ground-Wrongful-Assessment-Tax-Liability-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Madras HC Dismisses WP against Assessment Order passed u/s 73 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act on ground of Limitation [Read Order] Madras HC Dismisses WP against Assessment Order passed u/s 73 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Madras-HC-WP-Assessment-Order-passed-Tamil-Nadu-Goods-Services-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Rejection of Claim of Refund Application u/s 27A of the Customs Act without Giving Sufficient opportunity to petitioner: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order] Rejection of Claim of Refund Application u/s 27A of the Customs Act without Giving Sufficient opportunity to petitioner: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Rejection-Claim-Refund-Application-Customs-Act-Giving-Sufficient-petitioner-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Madras HC Upholds Order passed by Deputy Commissioner u/s 220(6) of Income Tax Act on ground of Non-appearance of Petitioner [Read Order] Madras HC Upholds Order passed by Deputy Commissioner u/s 220(6) of Income Tax Act on ground of Non-appearance of Petitioner [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Madras-HC-Madras-HC-Upholds-Order-Madras-HC-Upholds-Order-passed-by-Deputy-Commissioner-taxscan.jpg)
![Boiler Ash and Sludge which emerged as Byproducts falls outside purview of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules: CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed on Excess Recovery Demand [Read Order] Boiler Ash and Sludge which emerged as Byproducts falls outside purview of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules: CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed on Excess Recovery Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Boiler-Ash-Sludge-emerged-Byproducts-falls-purview-Rule-CENVAT-Credit-CESTAT-Penalty-Recovery-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order] Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/JSW-steels-ltd-quash-demand-central-excise-duty-assessee-waste-pickle-liquid-waste-taxscan.jpg)
![Invoice or Challan issued by Provider of Input Service is a Relevant Document for Availing CENVAT credit u/r 9 of CENVAT credit rules: CESTAT [Read Order] Invoice or Challan issued by Provider of Input Service is a Relevant Document for Availing CENVAT credit u/r 9 of CENVAT credit rules: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Invoice-Challan-Relevant-Document-CENVAT-credit-rules-CESTAT-TAXSCAN-1.jpg)
![Manufacturer of Final Product is Entitled to Take Credit of Excise Duty on Capital Goods received in Factory for Production of Final Product: CESTAT [Read Order] Manufacturer of Final Product is Entitled to Take Credit of Excise Duty on Capital Goods received in Factory for Production of Final Product: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Manufacturer-Final-Product-Take-Credit-Excise-Duty-Capital-Goods-Factory-Production-Final-Product-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg)