Sneha Sukumaran Mullakkal
Sneha Sukumaran Mullakkal is a graduate in Business Administration and Law with a keen interest in laws impacting everyday lives. She is a passionate dancer who also finds joy in singing and drawing. With a strong commitment to making legal concepts accessible and relevant to the common person, she brings a unique blend of analytical thinking and artistic expression to her work.
![Relief for L.G. Electronics: CESTAT Directs Interest Payment on Post-2014 Pre-deposit u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/500x300_2061361-lg-electronics.webp "Relief for L.G. Electronics: CESTAT Directs Interest Payment on Post-2014 Pre-deposit u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
Relief for L.G. Electronics: CESTAT Directs Interest Payment on Post-2014 Pre-deposit u/s 35FF of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) granted relief to L.G. Electronics by holding that interest was...
![Interest for Belated GST Payment: Madras HC Confirms Interest Levied u/s 50(1) of CGST/ TNGST Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/250x150_2061292-gst-interest-1.webp "Interest for Belated GST Payment: Madras HC Confirms Interest Levied u/s 50(1) of CGST/ TNGST Act [Read Order]")
![Relief for Rolls Royce: ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Assessment Order Passed Beyond S.144C(13) Deadline [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/250x150_2061227-rolls-royce-taxscan.webp "Relief for Rolls Royce: ITAT Quashes Time-Barred Assessment Order Passed Beyond S.144C(13) Deadline [Read Order]")
![GST Registration Cancelled due to Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati HC Allows Restoration Upon Clearing Dues [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/250x150_2060688-gst-registration-taxscan.webp "GST Registration Cancelled due to Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati HC Allows Restoration Upon Clearing Dues [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC Allows Refiling of GST Refund Applications Due to Non-Communication of Deficiencies on Portal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/250x150_2060671-gst-refund-taxscan.webp "Calcutta HC Allows Refiling of GST Refund Applications Due to Non-Communication of Deficiencies on Portal [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Allows Concessional Duty Benefit on Aluminium Based Laminates Used in MCPCBs [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060599-manufacture-of-metal-clad-printed-circuit-boards.webp "CESTAT Allows Concessional Duty Benefit on Aluminium Based Laminates Used in MCPCBs [Read Order]")
Assessment Order Passed Without Personal Hearing u/s 75(4) of GST Act: Patna HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The High Court of Patna, quashed an assessment order passed against the assessee for the period 2018-2019, observing that it had been issued without affording a personal hearing as mandated under...
![Assessment Order Passed Without Personal Hearing u/s 75(4) of GST Act: Patna HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060598-assessment-order-assessment-order-passed-without-personal-hearing-personal-hearing-taxscan.webp "Assessment Order Passed Without Personal Hearing u/s 75(4) of GST Act: Patna HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) granted relief to Bosch Ltd and ruled that the notional cost of free design and drawings provided by Maruti Suzuki...
![Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060584-bosch-ltd-taxscan.webp "Relief to Bosch: CESTAT Rules Notional Cost of Free Designs from Maruti Not Part of Excise Duty Valuation [Read Order]")
ITAT Quashes Reassessment Initiated on Mere Suspicion of Money Laundering Without Concrete Evidence [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated against the assessee, holding that they were based solely on suspicion of money laundering and...
![ITAT Quashes Reassessment Initiated on Mere Suspicion of Money Laundering Without Concrete Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060582-reassessment-.webp "ITAT Quashes Reassessment Initiated on Mere Suspicion of Money Laundering Without Concrete Evidence [Read Order]")
Non-Service of Notice Through Opted Physical Mode: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read More]
The Raipur Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)] for fresh adjudication after observing that notices were not served...
![Non-Service of Notice Through Opted Physical Mode: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read More]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060616-opted-physical-mode-itat-restores-notice-taxscan.webp "Non-Service of Notice Through Opted Physical Mode: ITAT Restores Matter to CIT(A) for Fresh Adjudication [Read More]")
Rejection of Registration Application for Wrong Section Code: ITAT Allows Revised Form 10D Filing Before CIT(E) [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allows revised Form 10D filing before Commissioner of Income Tax ( Exemption)[CIT(E)], after rejecting the initial registration...
![Rejection of Registration Application for Wrong Section Code: ITAT Allows Revised Form 10D Filing Before CIT(E) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060562-rejection-registration-application-taxscan.webp "Rejection of Registration Application for Wrong Section Code: ITAT Allows Revised Form 10D Filing Before CIT(E) [Read Order]")
CIT(A)’s Deletion of ₹2.32 Cr Addition u/s 68 Based on Evidence Admitted in Violation of Rule 46A: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands to AO [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [CIT(A)]’s order deleting an addition of ₹2.32 crore under Section 68 of Income Tax...
![CIT(A)’s Deletion of ₹2.32 Cr Addition u/s 68 Based on Evidence Admitted in Violation of Rule 46A: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/07/500x300_2060556-section-68-addition.webp "CIT(A)’s Deletion of ₹2.32 Cr Addition u/s 68 Based on Evidence Admitted in Violation of Rule 46A: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands to AO [Read Order]")