Sneha Sukumaran Mullakkal
Sneha Sukumaran Mullakkal is a graduate in Business Administration and Law with a keen interest in laws impacting everyday lives. She is a passionate dancer who also finds joy in singing and drawing. With a strong commitment to making legal concepts accessible and relevant to the common person, she brings a unique blend of analytical thinking and artistic expression to her work.
![CESTAT Allows Concessional Duty Benefit on Aluminium Based Laminates Used in MCPCBs [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070722-cestat-concessional-duty-aluminium-laminates-used-mcpcbs-taxscan1.webp "CESTAT Allows Concessional Duty Benefit on Aluminium Based Laminates Used in MCPCBs [Read Order]")
CESTAT Allows Concessional Duty Benefit on Aluminium Based Laminates Used in MCPCBs [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) allowed the benefit of concessional customs duty on aluminium-based...
![Failure to Deduct TDS on Expenses u/s 40(a)(ia): ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Order, Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/250x150_2070772-failure-deduct-tds-on-expenses-itat-ex-parte-order-remands-matter-fresh-adjudication-taxscan.webp "Failure to Deduct TDS on Expenses u/s 40(a)(ia): ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Order, Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
![Relief for Malayala Manorama: CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Paper in Reels as Newsprint Due to Non-ISO Testing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070429-malayala-manorama.webp "Relief for Malayala Manorama: CESTAT Allows Classification of Imported Paper in Reels as Newsprint Due to Non-ISO Testing [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Quashes Consolidated GST Order for Multiple Years, Says Each Year Requires Separate Notice and Assessment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070329-gst-assessment-order-high-court-madras-high-court-sets-aside-the-assessment-order-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Quashes Consolidated GST Order for Multiple Years, Says Each Year Requires Separate Notice and Assessment [Read Order]")
![Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s  23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/250x150_2070103-failure-to-examine-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-taxscan.webp "Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s  23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), condoned the delay in filing an appeal against a disallowance of ₹24.22 lakh towards Employees’ State Insurance/Provident Fund (ESI/PF)...
![Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070088-disallowance-disallowance-of-2422-lakh-towards-esi-pf-esi-pf-section-361va-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]")
₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]’s order deleting a ₹1.5 crore addition treated as an accommodation entry under...
![₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070083-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-tascan.webp "₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after finding that the denial of Section 115BBF of Income Tax...
![Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070112-form-3cfa-nonfiling-itat-taxscan.webp "Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Against GST Demand Citing Fraudulent ITC Allegations, Grants One Month to File Appeal [Read Order]
The HIgh Court of Delhi, dismissed a writ petition against a Goods and Service Tax (GST) demand citing allegations of fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) but granted the petitioner one month to file ...
![Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Against GST Demand Citing Fraudulent ITC Allegations, Grants One Month to File Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070093-delhi-high-court-gst-demand-itc-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Dismisses Writ Against GST Demand Citing Fraudulent ITC Allegations, Grants One Month to File Appeal [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO )after examining the disallowance of a ₹58.83 lakh deduction claimed under Section 57 of...
![Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070060-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")
Karnataka HC Disposes Himalaya Drug Company Appeal as Assessment Held Time-Barred u/s 144C(13) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka, disposed of the appeal filed by Himalaya Drug Company after holding that the assessment was time-barred under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act,1961. ...
![Karnataka HC Disposes Himalaya Drug Company Appeal as Assessment Held Time-Barred u/s 144C(13) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/26/500x300_2069411-himalaya-drug-company-tax-appeal.webp "Karnataka HC Disposes Himalaya Drug Company Appeal as Assessment Held Time-Barred u/s 144C(13) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")