Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Taxscan Team
Penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act not permissible in the Absence of Evidence which proves the Use of Forged Scrips to clear Goods: CESTAT
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act,1962 is not...
![An Amalgamated Company can claim Depreciation on Goodwill, No restriction u/s 32(1)(5): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Amalgamated-Company-Depreciation-Goodwill-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "An Amalgamated Company can claim Depreciation on Goodwill, No restriction u/s 32(1)(5): ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-CENVAT-Credit-Statements-confirmed-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC directs to Refund of amounts paid during the Course of the Investigation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Bombay-HC-Refund-Investigation-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC directs to Refund of amounts paid during the Course of the Investigation [Read Order]")
Addition of Unexplained Cash based on Third-Party Statements without Opportunity for Cross-Examination is not sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]
While considering a bunch of appeals the Lucknow bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the addition of unexplained cash based on third-party statements without allowing...
![Addition of Unexplained Cash based on Third-Party Statements without Opportunity for Cross-Examination is not sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/unexplained-cash-cross-examination-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Addition of Unexplained Cash based on Third-Party Statements without Opportunity for Cross-Examination is not sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 43CA on absence of Evidence for Receipt of Money in addition to Sale Consideration is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi held that Addition u/s 43CA on absence of evidence for receipt of money in addition to sale consideration is invalid. The assessee Company, M/s....
![Addition u/s 43CA on absence of Evidence for Receipt of Money in addition to Sale Consideration is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/absence-of-evidence-receipt-of-money-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Addition u/s 43CA on absence of Evidence for Receipt of Money in addition to Sale Consideration is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
