Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
Supreme Court Rejects Resolution Plan of JSW, Orders Liquidation
The Supreme Court rejected the Resolution Plan submitted by JSW Steel for Bhushan Steel and Power Ltd holding that the Resolution Plan was illegal...
![Relief to Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited: CESTAT allows Refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while Exempting Excise Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Customs-Duty-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-fine-case-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-customs-case-taxscan-2.jpg "Relief to Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited: CESTAT allows Refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while Exempting Excise Duty [Read Order]")
![Jurisdiction of AO u/s 153C of Income Tax Act beyond block of 10 year is invalid: Delhi HC upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Benefit-of-Monetary-Limits-Guidelines-Dispute-related-to-Classification-Product-for-Customs-Duty-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpg "Jurisdiction of AO u/s 153C of Income Tax Act beyond block of 10 year is invalid: Delhi HC upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]")
![Subscription fee collected for e-magazine Content does not fall under Fee for Technical Service: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-High-Court-e-magazine-Content-Subscription-fee-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Subscription fee collected for e-magazine Content does not fall under Fee for Technical Service: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![GST SCN uploaded improperly in ‘additional notices tab’: Delhi HC directs Dept. to rehear [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SCN-upload-in-wrong-tab-case-Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-on-GST-SCN-upload-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST SCN uploaded improperly in ‘additional notices tab’: Delhi HC directs Dept. to rehear [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC sets aside Notice u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, citing Bar by Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/notice-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC sets aside Notice u/s 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, citing Bar by Limitation [Read Order]")
Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the contested amount paid as excise duty under protest is not covered by unjust enrichment because it...
![Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Clearance-of-Goods-site-img.jpg "Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that consultancy services to the foreign university/foreign group entity do not fall under the category of...
![Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Foreign-University-site-img.jpg "Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtor's Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court upheld the delivery of a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) to the corporate debtor's Key Managerial Personnel (KMP), stating that the...
![Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtors Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Supreme-Court-Upholds-Demand-Notice-Section-8-IBC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtors Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]")
Madras HC Permits Rectification of clerical errors in GSTR-1 beyond statutory timelines under CGST Act [Read Order]
The Madras High Court held that clerical errors must be rectifiable even beyond statutory timelines. Further held that denial of ITC to buyers for no fault of theirs results in double taxation and...
![Madras HC Permits Rectification of clerical errors in GSTR-1 beyond statutory timelines under CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GSTR-1-Madras-HC-CGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Permits Rectification of clerical errors in GSTR-1 beyond statutory timelines under CGST Act [Read Order]")