Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2058909-2041840-penalty-us-2711c-estimated-itat-penalty-absence-concealment-taxscan-1.webp "Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Declaration of Value of Goods Cannot be Treated as Suppression Merely Being Incorrect: CESTAT quashes Penalty under Customs Act [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the declaration of the value of goods was a ...
![Demand of Service Tax cannot be Solely based on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2058908-income-tax-update-form-26as-taxscan.webp "Demand of Service Tax cannot be Solely based on Income Tax Data in Form 26AS: CESTAT Quashes Demand [Read Order]")
![Kerala HC Upholds validity of SCN Served on Adult Member of Noticee u/s 153 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2058904-notice-customs-taxscan.webp "Kerala HC Upholds validity of SCN Served on Adult Member of Noticee u/s 153 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of Consignment Note qualify as GTA service and not renting and leasing: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2058898-industrial-gases-1.webp "Industrial gases in VITT transported by carrier agency upon issue of Consignment Note qualify as GTA service and not renting and leasing: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Security services qualify as input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, as service utilized for manufacture of dutiable final products: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/250x150_2058878-security.webp "Security services qualify as input service u/r 2(l) of CCR, as service utilized for manufacture of dutiable final products: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Mandatory Personal hearing u/s 28(8) of Customs Act cannot be denied by relying on special provision S.122A: Kerala HC
The Kerala High Court has held that a mandatory hearing opportunity is to be granted under section 28(8) of the Customs Act, 1962 and it cannot be denied by the department by relying on a special...
SCN u/s 75(10) of CGST Act issued after 30 days period is without Jurisdiction: Gujarat HC rules in favour of IndusInd Bank [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Gujarat High Court ruled in favour of IndusInd Bank, holding that a show cause notice (SCN) under section 75(10) of the Central Goods andService Tax Act (CGST Act), 2017,...
![SCN u/s 75(10) of CGST Act issued after 30 days period is without Jurisdiction: Gujarat HC rules in favour of IndusInd Bank [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/03/500x300_2058446-indusind-bank.webp "SCN u/s 75(10) of CGST Act issued after 30 days period is without Jurisdiction: Gujarat HC rules in favour of IndusInd Bank [Read Order]")
![Patna HC Directs State GST Dept to refund Rs. 10K against Illegal GST Recovery Conducted [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/02/500x300_2058087-refund-service-tax-address-mismatch-taxscan-2.webp "Patna HC Directs State GST Dept to refund Rs. 10K against Illegal GST Recovery Conducted [Read Order]")
Relief to Punjab National Bank : DRAT Directs Fresh adjudication on submission of Additional Evidence Taken under Securitization Application
The Kolkata bench of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal ( DRAT ) in a ruling in favour of Punjab National Bank has directed the fresh adjudication on submission of additional evidence taken ...
134 days Delay in filing Appeal is not Condonable as per SARFAESI Act even without Cogent Reason : DRAT Dismisses appeal of PNB Housing Finance
In a recent case, the Allahabad bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal(DRAT) dismisses the condonation application of PNB Housing Finance holding that 134 days delay in filing appeal is not...
Invalidating Sale on ground processing of valuation report as per SARFAESI Act is not Maintainable in Absence of Changes in Valuation: DRAT rules in favour of SBI
The Chennai bench of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in a ruling in favor of SBI, has held that invalidating sale on ground of processing a valuation report as per the SARFAESI Act is...
