Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is graduated from Government Law College Thiruvananthapuram on BA. LLB and is currently pursuing LLM in Constitutional Law. She is working as a content writer who is passionate in Content creation. Her area of interest are Constitutional law and Co-operate Law. She is also into teaching, baking, reading and gardening.
![Pre-CIRP Electricity Dues Expires on Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pre-CIRP-Electricity-Dues-Expires-Approval-Resolution-Plan-under-IBC-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Pre-CIRP Electricity Dues Expires on Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Pre-CIRP Electricity Dues Expires on Approval of Resolution Plan under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has reaffirmed that all claims that are not covered by the Resolution Plan that has...
![AO must issue Speaking Orders Against Assessees Written Objections: Calcutta HC Upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Speaking-Orders-AO-must-issue-Speaking-Orders-Calcutta-HC-Calcutta-HC-Upholds-ITAT-Order-ITAT-Order-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO must issue Speaking Orders Against Assessees Written Objections: Calcutta HC Upholds ITAT Order [Read Order]")
![BCCIs Plea for Settlement & Withdrawal of CIRP Against Byjus Within One Week: NCLAT directs NCLT to Decide [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Byjus.jpg "BCCIs Plea for Settlement & Withdrawal of CIRP Against Byjus Within One Week: NCLAT directs NCLT to Decide [Read Order]")
GST Dept fails to consider some Payments made while Passing Adjudication Order passed u/s 74Â of GST Act: Orissa HC sets aside Order [Read Order]
The petitioner, Simanchal Achary, is a works contractor, is challenging the first appellate order passed under section 107 of th Act related to the tax period from July 2017 to March 2018. The...
![GST Dept fails to consider some Payments made while Passing Adjudication Order passed u/s 74Â of GST Act: Orissa HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GST-section-74-of-GST-Act-payments-taxscan.jpg "GST Dept fails to consider some Payments made while Passing Adjudication Order passed u/s 74Â of GST Act: Orissa HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
![Orissa HC Sets aside Order Passed u/s 74 of CGST due to Jurisdictional Error [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Orissa-HC-Orissa-HC-Sets-aside-Order-Section-74-of-CGST-due-CGST-Jurisdictional-Error-taxscan.jpg "Orissa HC Sets aside Order Passed u/s 74 of CGST due to Jurisdictional Error [Read Order]")
Orissa HC Restores Pending Proceedings on Demand of GST on Suppression and Wilfull Misstatement [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Orissa restored the pending proceedings demand of Goods and Service Tax (GST) on suppression and wilful misstatement. Â Mr. Harichandan, advocate appears on...
![Orissa HC Restores Pending Proceedings on Demand of GST on Suppression and Wilfull Misstatement [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Orissa-HC-Pending-Proceedings-Demand-of-GST-Suppression-Wilfull-Misstatement-taxscan.jpg "Orissa HC Restores Pending Proceedings on Demand of GST on Suppression and Wilfull Misstatement [Read Order]")
![Karnataka HC Quashes Penalty for Non-Deduction of TDS on Professional Advice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Karnataka-High-Court-Non-Deduction-of-TDS-TDS-Tax-Deducted-at-Source-TAXSCAN.jpg "Karnataka HC Quashes Penalty for Non-Deduction of TDS on Professional Advice [Read Order]")
Madras HC issues Directions to Streamline Cheque Bounce cases under Negotiable Instruments Act [Read Order]
In order to expedite and guarantee the timely resolution of check bounce cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act), the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court issued a number of...
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling; Imposing Service Tax on Lottery Distributor is Unconstitutional [Read Judgement]
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court dismissed the Union Government’s appeal, affirming that lottery distributors are not liable to pay service tax under the Finance Act, 1994. The Court held that...
![Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling; Imposing Service Tax on Lottery Distributor is Unconstitutional [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Supreme-Court-Landmark-Ruling-Imposing-Service-Tax-Lottery-Distributor-Unconstitutional-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling; Imposing Service Tax on Lottery Distributor is Unconstitutional [Read Judgement]")