Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Jharkhand HC refuses to Condone 17 Months in Filing Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CGST-Act-GST-returns-GST-registration-cancellation-taxscan.jpg "Jharkhand HC refuses to Condone 17 Months in Filing Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act [Read Order]")
Jharkhand HC refuses to Condone 17 Months in Filing Appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court ruled that an appeal filed after the deadline specified under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017,...
![GST Rate Mentioned Prevalent on Day of Receipt of Tender is Leviable by contractors. J&K HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Jammu-and-Kashmir-High-Court-GST-Rate-taxscan.jpg "GST Rate Mentioned Prevalent on Day of Receipt of Tender is Leviable by contractors. J&K HC [Read Order]")
![Refund of GST Pre-Deposit made u/s 107(6)(b) cannot be Denied on Grounds of Limitation: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Refund-of-GST-Pre-Deposit-Denied-Grounds-Limitation-Jharkhand-HC-taxscan.jpg "Refund of GST Pre-Deposit made u/s 107(6)(b) cannot be Denied on Grounds of Limitation: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
![Revised Property Tax for Past 3 Years to be paid by Building Owners Liable after Adjusting Already Paid Amount: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Revised-Property-Building-Owners-Liable-Adjusting-Paid-Amount-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg "Revised Property Tax for Past 3 Years to be paid by Building Owners Liable after Adjusting Already Paid Amount: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
![GST Commissioner Refuses to provide Personal Hearing Despite Written Request: Allahabad HC Imposes 20K Cost [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-provide-Personal-Hearing-Request-Allahabad-HC-taxscan.jpg "GST Commissioner Refuses to provide Personal Hearing Despite Written Request: Allahabad HC Imposes 20K Cost [Read Order]")
Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]
In a ruling, the Bombay High Court sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B, read with the first proviso to Section 147 of the...
![Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Tax-Reassessment-Order.jpg "Bombay HC sets aside Income Tax Reassessment Order in Citing Violation of mandatory unamended provisions under Section 144B [Read Order]")
![Challenge against Penalty Imposed under Customs Act: Telangana HC directs to appeal before CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Telangana-High-Court-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Challenge against Penalty Imposed under Customs Act: Telangana HC directs to appeal before CESTAT [Read Order]")
Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” u/s 92F of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in a recent case held that advertising, marketing, and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” under section 92F of the Income...
![Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” u/s 92F of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Delhi-High-Court-Income-tax-Income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure incurred not constitute an “international transaction” u/s 92F of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has remanded the issue on applicability of cenvat credit in case of Jindal steel Ltd on the input used fro electricity generated and sold to HSEB....
![Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-Cenvat-.jpg "Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cenvat Credit on Transitional period Under GST Not Allowable on Capital Goods Received After July 1, 2017: Patna HC [Read Order]
While upholding the recovery of ineligible CENVAT credit, the Patna High Court has held that transitional credit under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime cannot be availed for capital goods...
![Cenvat Credit on Transitional period Under GST Not Allowable on Capital Goods Received After July 1, 2017: Patna HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cenvat Credit on Transitional period Under GST Not Allowable on Capital Goods Received After July 1, 2017: Patna HC [Read Order]")
Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that an additional penalty under section 125 of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is not applicable when late fees are levied for non-filing or delayed filing of GST...
![Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Additional-Penalty-Penalty-Late-Fees-Levied-for-Non-Filing-Non-Filing-or-Delayed-Filing-taxscan.jpg "Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses Petition Challenging GST Order u/s 73 of on Availability of Statutory Remedy [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition challenging an order under section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, on the availability of statutory...
![Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses Petition Challenging GST Order u/s 73 of on Availability of Statutory Remedy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/GST-order.jpg "Chhattisgarh HC Dismisses Petition Challenging GST Order u/s 73 of on Availability of Statutory Remedy [Read Order]")