- Home
- »
- Yogitha S. Yogesh

Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Orissa HC Sets aside Proceedings initiated u/s 73 of CGST Act without providing Opportunity of Hearing [Read Order] Orissa HC Sets aside Proceedings initiated u/s 73 of CGST Act without providing Opportunity of Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Orissa-High-Court-CGST-Act-Orissa-HC-Sets-aside-Proceedings-taxscan.jpg)
Orissa HC Sets aside Proceedings initiated u/s 73 of CGST Act without providing Opportunity of Hearing [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Orissa High Court set aside the proceedings initiated under section 73 of Central Goods and Service Tax ( CGST) Act, 2017...
Wrongfully Seizure of NRI’s Personal Belongings by Customs Dept: Delhi HC allows to Avail Baggage Rule Benefits [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the non-resident Indian (NRI) is fully entitled to the benefit provided to an eligible passenger under the Baggage Rules, 2016. Since the customs department had...
Cheque Dishonouring Case become Invalid when cause of Action arose after Declaration of Moratorium under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court ruled that proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the former director of the company cannot proceed if the cause of action for the...
In Absence of Fraud or Misrepresentation, Order Admitting CIRP cannot be Recalled: NCLT rules in favour of Canara Bank [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai bench partially granted Canara Bank's interim plea concerning the CIRP of Carnival Techno Park Pt. Ltd (CTPPL). Although Canara Bank's request to recall CIRP...
Delhi HC refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Second Appeal before CESTAT due to Negligence of Assessee in Tracking Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has refused to condone the delay in submitting a second appeal, stating that the assessee was negligent in following the order and that the Commissioner (Appeals) was not at...
CENVAT credit to ‘interior decorator service’ is not admissible as eligible input service: CESTAT rules in Capgemini Technology Services case [Read Order]
In the case of Capgemini Technology Services, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that CENVAT credit to ‘interior decorator service’ is not...
Relief to Capgemini Technology Services, ITC cannot be denied due to procedural lapses: CESTAT [Read Order]
In ruling in favour of Capgemini Technology Services, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that input tax credit (ITC) cannot be denied due...
‘Ship Management Services’ by Capgemini Technology Services, Not amounts to Input Service In absence of Documents: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case on Capgemini Technology Services India ltd, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that ‘ship management services’ not amounts...


![Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order] Non Compliance of Pre deposit Condition u/s 35 F of Central Excise Act: Kerala HCÂ Dismisses Customs Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Non-Compliance-of-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Condition-Pre-deposit-Section-35-F-of-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Act-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg)
![Disallowance of Deduction Claim u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act without Following Precedence: Kerala HC sets aside Assessment order [Read Order] Disallowance of Deduction Claim u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act without Following Precedence: Kerala HC sets aside Assessment order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Disallowance-Deduction-Claim-Income-Tax-Act-Kerala-HC-Assessment-order-taxscan.jpg)
![Composite GST Order for Several Financial years is not Legally Proper: Kerala HC Directs to Pass Separate Order [Read Order] Composite GST Order for Several Financial years is not Legally Proper: Kerala HC Directs to Pass Separate Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/GST-Order-GST-Order-for-Several-Financial-years-Several-Financial-years-Several-Financial-years-is-Not-Legally-Proper-Kerala-HC-taxscan.jpg)
![1% of Disputed VAT amount has to be Paid to Kerala Legal Benefit Fund From 07.04.2016: Kerala HC [Read Order] 1% of Disputed VAT amount has to be Paid to Kerala Legal Benefit Fund From 07.04.2016: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/VAT-amount-Kerala-Legal-Benefit-Fund-Kerala-Legal-Benefit-Kerala-HC-Disputed-VAT-amount-Legal-Benefit-Fund-taxscan.jpg)
![Wrongfully Seizure of NRI’s Personal Belongings by Customs Dept: Delhi HC allows to Avail Baggage Rule Benefits [Read Order] Wrongfully Seizure of NRI’s Personal Belongings by Customs Dept: Delhi HC allows to Avail Baggage Rule Benefits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Wrongfully-Seizure-of-NRIs-Customs-Dept-Baggage-Rule-Benefits-taxscan.jpg)
![Cheque Dishonouring Case become Invalid when cause of Action arose after Declaration of Moratorium under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement] Cheque Dishonouring Case become Invalid when cause of Action arose after Declaration of Moratorium under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/IBC-Supreme-Court-Cheque-Dishonouring-Case-taxscan.jpg)
![In Absence of Fraud or Misrepresentation, Order Admitting CIRP cannot be Recalled: NCLT rules in favour of Canara Bank [Read Order] In Absence of Fraud or Misrepresentation, Order Admitting CIRP cannot be Recalled: NCLT rules in favour of Canara Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Absence-of-Fraud-Misrepresentation-Admitting-CIRP-CIRP-Cannot-be-Recalled-NCLT-NCLT-rules-NCLT-rules-in-favour-of-Canara-Bank-Canara-Bank-taxscan.jpg)
![CENVAT credit to ‘interior decorator service’ is not admissible as eligible input service: CESTAT rules in Capgemini Technology Services case [Read Order] CENVAT credit to ‘interior decorator service’ is not admissible as eligible input service: CESTAT rules in Capgemini Technology Services case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Capgemini-Technology-Services-case-TAXSCAN.jpg)
![Relief to Capgemini Technology Services, ITC cannot be denied due to procedural lapses: CESTAT [Read Order] Relief to Capgemini Technology Services, ITC cannot be denied due to procedural lapses: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Relief-to-Capgemini-Technology-Services-taxscan.jpg)
![‘Ship Management Services’ by Capgemini Technology Services, Not amounts to Input Service In absence of Documents: CESTAT [Read Order] ‘Ship Management Services’ by Capgemini Technology Services, Not amounts to Input Service In absence of Documents: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Ship-Management-Services-Capgemini-Technology-Services-TAXSCAN.jpg)